Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-20 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi! > > I published a complete rewrite of the earlier draft as: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/12 > > DEP-18: Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request > > based Collaboration for Debian packages > > > > If you are in favor of having this as a

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-11-20 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi! > fwiw, I'm also not using git-buildpackage and I don't want to. (Step learning > curve, too much magic, hard to debug and I dont see benefits for the packages > I maintain.) I'm also not a beginner. And I love gbp-dch. I think git-buildpackage is great, and I am a happy user. However, it too

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-11-20 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Kari, Have you seen: https://wiki.debian.org/GitPackagingSurvey You may find something suitable for what you want there. -- Sean Whitton

Re: Is there a point to retaining src:pth?

2024-11-20 Thread NIIBE Yutaka
Hello, Xiao Shen Wen, thank you for including me in the loop. I noticed that the removal by the 1087708. And, thanks to nabijaczleweli for the action of removing the package. Removing GNU Pth package in Debian is good. That's good move and I support this decision. In Debian, you know, I have

Bug#1087956: ITP: zabbix-cli -- Command-line interface for Zabbix

2024-11-20 Thread Jakob Haufe
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jakob Haufe X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: zabbix-cli Version : 3.3.0 Upstream Contact: Name * URL : https://github.com/unioslo/zabbix-cli * License : GPL3 Programming Lang: Python Descri

Re: [Artwork] Survey for the default artwork for Trixie (Debian 13)

2024-11-20 Thread Richard Lewis
Jonathan carter writes: >> https://surveys.debian.net/ I found the wording a bit confusing -- i expect you will get a lot of votes in the reverse order to what is extended. I suggest "ranking" and "choices" are a too similar: and the text seems to use them backwards to normal usage in one place

Re: DEP-18 v2: request for comments

2024-11-20 Thread Richard Lewis
Otto Kekäläinen writes: > Hi all, > > I published a complete rewrite of the earlier draft as: > > https://salsa.debian.org/dep-team/deps/-/merge_requests/12 > DEP-18: Encourage Continuous Integration and Merge Request > based Collaboration for Debian packages > > If you are in favor o

Bug#1087939: ITP: pd-slip -- SLIP encoder/decoder for Pure Data (Pd)

2024-11-20 Thread Debian/GNU
Package: wnpp X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Owner: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) Severity: wishlist * Package name: pd-slip Version : 0.1 Upstream Contact: https://github.com/pd-externals/slip * URL : https://github.com/pd-externals/slip * License

Bug#1087937: ITP: mimic -- eBPF UDP -> TCP obfuscator

2024-11-20 Thread Eric Long
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Eric Long X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, i...@hack3r.moe * Package name: mimic Version : 0.6.0 Upstream Contact: Eric Long * URL : https://github.com/hack3ric/mimic * License : GPL-2.0-only Programming La

Bug#1087932: ITP: python-deadlib -- Python dead batteries

2024-11-20 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Emmanuel Arias X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, eam...@debian.org * Package name: python-deadlib Version : 3.13.0 Upstream Contact: Jeong, YunWon * URL : https://github.com/youknowone/python-deadlib * License

Bug#1087928: ITP: reform-tools -- MNT System Tools for MNT Reform and MNT Pocket Reform

2024-11-20 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: reform-tools Version : 1.63 Upstream Contact: Lukas F. Hartmann * URL : https://source.mnt.re/reform/reform-tools/ * License :

Potential MBF: Migration from twitter-bootstrap{3,4} to bootstrap-html (v5)

2024-11-20 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
Dear fellow developers, (Sorry for any duplicate. I've tried to send a first mail to debian-devel, but it hadn't reached the list. So I am sending a more compact version of my previous message.) A little bit more of context can be found at: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript

Re: Is there a point to retaining src:pth?

2024-11-20 Thread 肖盛文
在 2024/11/17 22:34, наб 写道: [...] > >> As recently as bullseye, pth still had some significant >> reverse-(build-)dependencies: > This looked like a scary prospect, >> $ grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends -sPackage libpth-dev >> /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_bullseye_main_source_Sour