Re: ifupdown maintenance

2024-09-16 Thread Michael Stone
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 09:49:24AM +0200, Ansgar 🙀 wrote: Hi, On Sun, 2024-09-15 at 23:07 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 02:13:26PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: > If ifupdown's paradigm were working for people we wouldn't be having this > conversation. > How else would you m

Bug#1081971: ITP: python-construct-classes -- Python module for parsing and packing data classes

2024-09-16 Thread Soren Stoutner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Soren Stoutner X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-construct-classes Version : 0.1.2 Upstream Contact: matejcik * URL : https://github.com/matejcik/construct-classes/tree/main * License : E

Bug#1081966: ITP: uwsgi-plugin-lua -- Lua WSAPI plugin for uWSGI (Lua 5.1)

2024-09-16 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Package: wnpp X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Jonas Smedegaard * Package name: uwsgi-plugin-lua Version : 0.0.1 * URL : https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : Lua WSAPI plugin for uWSG

Re: Community survey on network stack for Trixie

2024-09-16 Thread Richard Lewis
Lukas Märdian writes: > On 04.09.24 17:26, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> Do we even have general documentation about configuring networking? > > Yes, there is a "NetworkConfiguration" page on the wiki and the Debian ref: > > * https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration I dont thinj this page is usefu

Re: ifupdown maintenance

2024-09-16 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
* Michael Stone [240916 05:04]: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 10:57:39AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > >Agreed: either it's drop-in compatible or we may as well switch the > >default to NM and/or systemd-networkd. > > > > Well, here's a heretical thought: why don't we do that anyway, at le

Re: ifupdown maintenance

2024-09-16 Thread Ansgar 🙀
Hi, On Sun, 2024-09-15 at 23:07 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 02:13:26PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote: > > If ifupdown's paradigm were working for people we wouldn't be having this > > conversation. > > How else would you move /etc/network/interfaces forward without breaking