DEP-18 discussion summary (Re: Request for feedback on draft: DEP-18: Enable true open collaboration on all Debian packages)

2024-08-27 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi! While I intend to continue on iterating DEP-18, here is a summary to those who did not wade through the 140+ messages on the topic. Unfortunately, the summary itself is also a bit long :) Summary of mailing list

Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories

2024-08-27 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2024-08-28 00:21:27 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote: [...] > Well, I don't want to just package the generated stuff, I would > prefer to have the tools to generate them myself from source at > build time. And that's what has been bothering me since the > beginning: I do not know how to do th

Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories

2024-08-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 8/27/24 22:30, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2024-08-27 19:41:54 +0200 (+0200), tho...@goirand.fr wrote: [...] All you wrote is precisely why I am not using these tarballs. I know we don't agree... :) Also, the FTP master do NOT want the changeLog as they are too big and provide no value when one

Bug#1079821: ITP: python-aiosomecomfort -- client for Honeywell's US-based cloud devices

2024-08-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-aiosomecomfort Version : 0.0.25 Upstream Author : Mike Kasper * URL : https://github.com/mkmer/AIOSomecomfort * License : GPL-3 Programm

Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories

2024-08-27 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2024-08-27 19:41:54 +0200 (+0200), tho...@goirand.fr wrote: [...] > All you wrote is precisely why I am not using these tarballs. I > know we don't agree... :) > > Also, the FTP master do NOT want the changeLog as they are too big > and provide no value when one can check the git repo to find t

Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories

2024-08-27 Thread thomas
On Aug 27, 2024 12:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2024-08-26 21:28:38 -0700 (-0700), Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 17:19, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > On 2024-04-02 16:44:54 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote: > > > [...] > > > > I think a shallow clone of depth 1

Packages "confirmed" and ready for DD review/possible upload - Debian Mentors - 2024-08-27

2024-08-27 Thread Phil Wyett
Dear all DDs, Below is the link to the page of currently "confirmed" being in good order packages that are awaiting a DD review and possible upload. If DDs could spare the time to pick up a package or two and finish off the package mentor process it would be greatly appreciated. https://bugs.debi

Re: Debian 10 "buster" moved to archive.debian.org

2024-08-27 Thread Philipp Matthias Hahn
Hello Ansgar, Am Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 09:30:49AM +0100 schrieb Ansgar 🙀: > Debian 10 "buster" has moved to archive.debian.org in order to free > space on the main mirror network. We plan to start removing files for > non-LTS architectures in about two weeks; the existing Release files > will then

Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories

2024-08-27 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2024-08-26 21:28:38 -0700 (-0700), Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 17:19, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2024-04-02 16:44:54 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote: > > [...] > > > I think a shallow clone of depth 1 is sufficient, although that's not > > > sufficient to get the correct v

Bug#1079769: ITP: python-farama-notifications -- Notifications for all Farama Foundation maintained libraries

2024-08-27 Thread Dong Xu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dong Xu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-farama-notifications Version : 0.0.4 Upstream Contact: Jordan Terry * URL : https://github.com/Farama-Foundation/Farama-Notifications * License :

Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories

2024-08-27 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
* Enrico Zini [2024-08-27 11:00]: On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 09:57:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: My guess is that the sweet spots are --depth=1 and a full checkout, it's not generally possible to tell which a given package needs in advance (in other words, it's best handled as a configuration o

Re: Validating tarballs against git repositories

2024-08-27 Thread Enrico Zini
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 09:57:41PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > My guess is that the sweet spots are --depth=1 and a full checkout, it's > not generally possible to tell which a given package needs in advance (in > other words, it's best handled as a configuration option), and it's > probably not

Re: DEP-18: Git and GitLab usage in other Linux distros (Re: Representing Debian Metadata in Git)

2024-08-27 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2024-08-27 08:42:53) > > Before pushing for new ways of representing Debian stuff in git, I think it > > would be a good idea to learn from all the other distros and distro-like > > systems successfully using git [1]. Debian is not the only distro that > > wants to use

Bug#1079754: ITP: scaphandre -- electric power/energy consumption monitoring agent

2024-08-27 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: scaphandre Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Contact: Benoit Petit * URL : https://github.com/hubblo-org/scapha