Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kathara Sasikumar
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: kathara
Version : 3.7.6
Upstream Contact: Kathara Framework
* URL : https://github.com/KatharaFramework/Kathara
* License : GPL-3+
Programmi
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 2:06 AM Ahmed Siam wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 2:00 AM Ahmed Siam wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 1:45 AM Ahmed Siam wrote:
> > > Perl pipeline run:
> > > - https://salsa.debian.org/ahmedsiam/perl/-/pipelines/719321
> This pipeline run from Nodejs shows a similar
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 2:00 AM Ahmed Siam wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 1:45 AM Ahmed Siam wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 1:25 AM Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > > A bunch of packages I know (nodejs, receptor to name a few) have salsa CI
> > > failures, but no sbuild failures.
> > > It woul
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 1:45 AM Ahmed Siam wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 1:25 AM Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > A bunch of packages I know (nodejs, receptor to name a few) have salsa CI
> > failures, but no sbuild failures.
> > It would be perfect if the build process was exactly the same.
>
> There
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 1:25 AM Jérémy Lal wrote:
> A bunch of packages I know (nodejs, receptor to name a few) have salsa CI
> failures, but no sbuild failures.
> It would be perfect if the build process was exactly the same.
There is a work-in-progress MRs about using sbuild for building packa
El 23/08/24 a las 16:00, Theodore Ts'o escribió:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 03:08:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > Salsa CI?)
> > The effort needed to do so is so small that the question really should
> > be "why should I NOT spend a few seconds enabling Salsa CI?".
> >
> > > 3) What's the s
On Aug 23, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > salsa update_projects $NAMESPACE/$PROJECT \
> > --jobs yes --ci-config-path recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline
>
> OK, more stupid questions. What is "$NAMESPACE"?
Whatever you see after "salsa.debian.org/" in the URL.
> And I thought I saw somethin
Le mer. 21 août 2024 à 03:36, Otto Kekäläinen a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> In short:
> I would very much like to see all top-150 packages run Salsa CI at
> least once before being uploaded to unstable. What people think is a
> reasonable way to proceed to reach this goal?
>
>
> Background:
> We have had s
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 04:00:25PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 03:08:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > Salsa CI?)
> > The effort needed to do so is so small that the question really should
> > be "why should I NOT spend a few seconds enabling Salsa CI?".
> >
> > > 3)
Hi!
> And is this web page authoratative? Or just a false search positive?
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline#basic-use
>
> It doesn't mention the "salsa" command at all, but maybe that isn't
> the right web page. This goes back to my observation that it would be
> helpful i
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 03:08:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Salsa CI?)
> The effort needed to do so is so small that the question really should
> be "why should I NOT spend a few seconds enabling Salsa CI?".
>
> > 3) What's the simple recipe for enable Salsa CI?
> salsa update_projects $NA
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: erebion
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, ereb...@erebion.eu
* Package name : tinyalsa
Version : git20240621
Upstream Contact: Taylor Holberton
* URL : https://github.com/tinyalsa/tinyalsa
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : TinyA
On Aug 23, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> 1) From a technical respective, what does Salsa CI buy me? Is it just
Maybe different and more Debian-specific tests than the one that you are
running elsewhere? They should all be documented here:
https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/ .
> 2) If I'
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 06:35:52PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>
> In short:
> I would very much like to see all top-150 packages run Salsa CI at
> least once before being uploaded to unstable. What people think is a
> reasonable way to proceed to reach this goal?
Since I'm the e2fsprogs (one o
On Friday, 23 August 2024 02:24:44 CDT lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the Debian (stable) installation on Macbook pro from 2019,
>
> my internal keyboard is not recognizable even I exhausted all possible
> keyboard options listed during
Hi,
I think this question would fit better on [debian-user].
Thanks, originally I posted on debian user, the only one who replied is
rather arrogant, I do not see the point to continue that thread,
I probably to start a new thread next time on debian-user, thanks again,
lina
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:05 AM Piper McCorkle wrote:
> On Friday, 23 August 202
Hi,
During the Debian (stable) installation on Macbook pro from 2019,
my internal keyboard is not recognizable even I exhausted all possible
keyboard options listed during
dpkg-reconfiguration keyboard-configuration
# more /etc/default/keyboard
# KEYBOARD CONFIGURATION FILE
# Consult the keyb
17 matches
Mail list logo
