Hi,
On 5/27/24 11:29, Luca Boccassi wrote:
With the default system installation including persistent journald by
default, it doesn't seem useful anymore to have such dependencies. They
are leftovers from an era where not having a system logging setup that
just worked by default was a thing, and
Hi,
Full context: https://bugs.debian.org/799549
TL;DR: drop or downgrade dependency on system-log-daemon from any
package that declares it
In Bookworm we enabled persistent journald by default, which was the
right choice. The problem is that some packages declare a dependency on
the virtual pac
On May 26, 2024 6:14:40 PM UTC, Bastian Blank wrote:
>On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 05:43:54PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On May 26, 2024 5:35:27 PM UTC, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> >https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/trixie-time-bomb/
>> The clamav issue looks like a false positive. T
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 10:28:21AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Pretty much every major Linux distribution is dropping _any_ 32 bit: Debian
> is trying to support 32 bit on armhf, for example, which is more than
> Ubuntu and Fedora.
I don't know what you're basing it on, but it's simply not t
Plus one to this initiative!
I also wanted to share the tip to use libfaketime as the easiest way
to test if a build or test suite works on an arbitrary future date. I
am currently testing that the MariaDB upstream test suite passes in
2037 and 2028 using libfaketime like this:
https://salsa.debia
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 05:43:54PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On May 26, 2024 5:35:27 PM UTC, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/trixie-time-bomb/
> The clamav issue looks like a false positive. The distro-info data will get
> updated between now and then.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yogeswaran Umasankar
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, kd8...@gmail.com
* Package name: python-proto-plus
Version : 1.23.0
Upstream Contact: Google LLC
* URL : https://github.com/googleapis/proto-plus-python
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ananthu C V
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ruby-cssbundling-rails
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Contact: David Heinemeier Hansson
* URL : https://github.com/rails/cssbundling-rails
* License : Exp
Hi Scott (2024.05.26_17:43:54_+)
> The clamav issue looks like a false positive. The distro-info data
> will get updated between now and then.
Same goes for distro-info, itself.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
Le dim. 26 mai 2024 à 19:35, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> * It would be wonderful if reproducible-builds people could set the
> time-to-build-in-future for trixie and sid to three years after the
> estimated release date of trixie (I believe they use six months ahead
> of time, which imo it's not eno
On 26.05.24 19:35, Santiago Vila wrote:
My plan is to file bug reports for the causing packages, initially
as severity:important bugs as a "grace period". (Paul asked me not to
report this as RC yet, because the t64 transition has not finished yet.
On the other hand, he also pointed out that now
On May 26, 2024 5:35:27 PM UTC, Santiago Vila wrote:
>Greetings.
>
>After we make a stable release, there is usually a constant flow
>of packages which start to FTBFS due to "time bombs", i.e. expired
>SSL certificates used in tests and other similar reasons.
>
>This is not fun for anybody tryi
Greetings.
After we make a stable release, there is usually a constant flow
of packages which start to FTBFS due to "time bombs", i.e. expired
SSL certificates used in tests and other similar reasons.
This is not fun for anybody trying to keep stable free of FTBFS bugs,
but fortunately we can do
13 matches
Mail list logo
