Re: Bug#1042428: lintian.debian.org off ?

2024-01-11 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/11/23 at 09:09 +0100, Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > Any chance to get back a front page with the complete list of tags, linking > to the individual tag pages ? > > The best I could find for now is [1] but it's not very practical. > > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/tree/maste

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2024-01-11 13:24, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > >... > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using > > > split debug symbols (disabled B

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-11 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 5:45 AM Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using > > split debug symbols (disabled BTF usage) should help here. > > Okay, maybe more workarounds e

Re: Bug#1060439: ITP: network-event-broker -- run scripts on systemd network events

2024-01-11 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Am 11.01.24 um 13:55 schrieb Tobias Schaffner: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tobias Schaffner * Package name: network-event-broker Version : 0.3.1+ds-1 Upstream Author : Susant Sahani * URL : https://github.com/vmware/network-event-broker * License

Bug#1060439: ITP: network-event-broker -- run scripts on systemd network events

2024-01-11 Thread Tobias Schaffner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tobias Schaffner * Package name: network-event-broker Version : 0.3.1+ds-1 Upstream Author : Susant Sahani * URL : https://github.com/vmware/network-event-broker * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Go Descriptio

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: >... > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using > > split debug symbols (disabled BTF usage) should help here. > > Okay, maybe more

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-11 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:50:31AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > As it is now, we will not be able to provide a kernel for maybe all > > 32bit architectures for Trixie. > I don't think that this would be a reasonable decision. We're preparing to > switch > 32-bit architectures over t

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-11 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using > split debug symbols (disabled BTF usage) should help here. Okay, maybe more workarounds exist. But none of them look really promising. > Separately,

Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-11 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi Linux 6.7 fails to build on at least i386 and armhf. Even it now manages to make the compiler fail to allocate memory: | cc1: out of memory allocating 135266296 bytes after a total of 235675648 bytes Right now both fail on the same driver, so a short team workaround would be to disable it. B