Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-20 Thread Gard Spreemann
Hi Johannes, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes: > Quoting Gard Spreemann (2023-09-20 09:26:58) >> Paul Wise writes: >> > […] since the Rust packages are basically only used as build-deps and >> > therefore have no human users. >> I just wanted to raise awareness that some of us humans do

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-20 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi Gard, Quoting Gard Spreemann (2023-09-20 09:26:58) > Paul Wise writes: > > […] since the Rust packages are basically only used as build-deps and > > therefore have no human users. > I just wanted to raise awareness that some of us humans do use librust-*-dev > packages directly, having put car

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-20 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Paul" == Paul Wise writes: Paul> Hi all, I have noticed that almost all Rust packages in Debian Paul> have boilerplate long descriptions that aren't very useful to Paul> Debian users. The only useful info is the crate name, but that Paul> is also in the package name. Pa

Re: lpr/lpd

2023-09-20 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El domingo, 17 de septiembre de 2023 14:13:32 -03 Thorsten Alteholz escribió: > Hi everybody, > > as you might have heard during the Debconf talk of Till, cups3 and CPDB > (Common Printing Dialog Backends) are waiting at the gates. > Maybe this is a good opportunity to get rid of some old legacy

Re: allow missing description fields and empty long descriptions for Rust/etc packages?

2023-09-20 Thread Gard Spreemann
Hi, Paul Wise writes: > […] since the Rust packages are basically only used as build-deps and > therefore have no human users. I just wanted to raise awareness that some of us humans do use librust-*-dev packages directly, having put cargo in permanent offline mode and having swapped out its ca