Bug#1052140: ITP: node-html-webpack-plugin -- node-webpack plugin to create HTML files

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Yadd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-html-webpack-plugin Version : 5.5.3 Upstream Contact: JS Foundation * URL : https://github.com/janti

Re: Do not plan to support /usr/lib/pam.d for Debian pam

Hi, On 18.09.23 05:16, Julian Andres Klode wrote: If you follow the argument for /usr to its logical conclusion of being the complete image, you end up moving state of the image (as opposed to the system) from /var/lib to /usr as well, for example /var/lib/dpkg and /var/lib/apt/extended_states.

Re: lpr/lpd

Hi, On 18.09.23 04:29, Russ Allbery wrote: It at least used to be that you could print directly to a remote printer with lpr and a pretty simple /etc/printcap entry that you could write manually. I used to use that mechanism to print to an office printer until I discovered rlpr, which is even

Re: [idea]: Switch default compression from "xz" to "zstd" for .deb packages

On Sun, 2023-09-17 at 22:16 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > I do not think wasting space is any good idea. > > > ## More bandwidth > >  According to https://www.speedtest.net/global-index, broadband > >  bandwidth > >  in Nicaragua becomes almost 10x > > And elsewhere it may have gone up a diff

Re: [idea]: Switch default compression from "xz" to "zstd" for .deb packages

Stephan Verbücheln wrote... > If you want to open that debate (again?), one should probably switch to > lzip. It uses the same LZMA compression like xz, but has a way more > sane file format. Besides the fact dpkg already has zstd support while lzip is missing, so that was a way bigger changes: I

Bug#1052135: ITP: check-build -- Check whether some example programs can be compiled and built

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Peter Pentchev X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Python Team , r...@debian.org * Package name: check-build Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Contact: Peter Pentchev * URL : https://gitlab.com/ppentchev/check-build * Li

Re: /usr-merge and filesystem bootstrap

Hi, On 2023-09-17 13:31, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Hi Aurelien, > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:02:35AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Answering for the glibc package. > > Thanks. > > > On 2023-09-12 20:15, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > > Once the Priority:required set only has that exception set left

Re: [idea]: Switch default compression from "xz" to "zstd" for .deb packages

On 16988 March 1977, Hideki Yamane wrote: Today I want to propose you to change default compression format in .deb, {data,control}.tar."xz" to ."zst". I want to hear your thought about this. Negative. # Compared to past change to xz proposal (in DebConf12) * More bandwidth * More CP

Re: Do not plan to support /usr/lib/pam.d for Debian pam

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 04:05:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 09:53:24PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > With the provision that I know next to nothing about pam - if I > > understood correctly how it works, why not simply do both? Ship the > > default file in the packag

Re: lpr/lpd

Christoph Biedl writes: > Well, not me. But the thing that puzzles me is the popcon numbers: lpr > has 755, lprng 233. > Assuming most of these installation were not done deliberately but are > rather by-catch, or: Caused by some package that eventually draws them > in, via a dependency that ha

Re: lpr/lpd

Thorsten Alteholz wrote... > Maybe this is a good opportunity to get rid of some old legacy stuff. Is > there anybody or do you know anybody who is using the old BSD lpr/lpd > stuff? Well, not me. But the thing that puzzles me is the popcon numbers: lpr has 755, lprng 233. Assuming most of these

lpr/lpd

Hi everybody, as you might have heard during the Debconf talk of Till, cups3 and CPDB (Common Printing Dialog Backends) are waiting at the gates. Maybe this is a good opportunity to get rid of some old legacy stuff. Is there anybody or do you know anybody who is using the old BSD lpr/lpd stuff

Bug#1052117: ITP: frappe-bench -- CLI to manage Multi-tenant deployments for Frappe apps

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Arun Mathai X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, m...@arunmathaisk.in * Package name: frappe-bench Version : 5.17.2 * URL : https://github.com/frappe/bench * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: Python Description

RE: debian testing daily build: installing GRUB/Bootloader and initramfs failing!!

thank you Gioele, yes i did got this bug to. but with https://bugs.debian.org/1040899 is trying to install Debian 13, with is VERY unstable and alpha stage, i hope debian 12 can be fixed... thank you André

Re: /usr-merge and filesystem bootstrap

Hi Aurelien, On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:02:35AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Answering for the glibc package. Thanks. > On 2023-09-12 20:15, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Once the Priority:required set only has that exception set left > > unconverted, I will prepare patches for the entire exception

Re: [idea]: Switch default compression from "xz" to "zstd" for .deb packages

If you want to open that debate (again?), one should probably switch to lzip. It uses the same LZMA compression like xz, but has a way more sane file format. Also note that the (pretended) multi-threading-capability of xz is mostly based on its improper file format[1]: > The xz-utils manual says

Re: [idea]: Switch default compression from "xz" to "zstd" for .deb packages

On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 09:31:03AM +0530, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 13:34:02 +0200 > Guillem Jover wrote: > > That's not correct. dpkg-deb is doing multi-threaded xz decompression > > since 1.21.13, and dpkg-source is doing multi-threaded xz compression > > and decompression since

Re: debian testing daily build: installing GRUB/Bootloader and initramfs failing!!

On 17/09/23 09:46, André Verwijs wrote: debian testing daily build:  installing GRUB/Bootloader and initramfs failing!! Probably you stumbled upon this problem: https://bugs.debian.org/1040899 The root cause has (hopefully) been fixed by the Debian Installer team and will be released soon: ht

debian testing daily build: installing GRUB/Bootloader and initramfs failing!!

debian testing daily build: installing GRUB/Bootloader and initramfs failing!! i will try to generate logfiles and report as bug. more info later.. thanks

debian testing daily build: installing GRUB/Bootloader and initramfs failing!!

debian testing daily build:  installing GRUB/Bootloader and initramfs  failing!! i will try to generate logfiles and report as bug. more info later.. thanks

debian testing daily build: installing GRUB/Bootloader failing!!

debian testing daily build:  installing GRUB/Bootloader and initramfs  failing!! i will try to generate logfiles and report as bug. more info later.. thanks