Re: Potential MBF: packages failing to build twice in a row

2023-08-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2023-08-05 at 17:29 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Devref §6.8.8.2 also says that "it is common for Debian users who > need to build software for non-Debian platforms to fetch the source > from a Debian mirror rather than trying to locate a canonical upstream > distribution point", but I'm

Re: snapshot.d.o has been in a bad state for several months

2023-08-08 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Hi Ted, * Theodore Ts'o [2023-08-08 20:28]: I was curious about this, since I rely on snapshots.debian.org in ^ snapshot ;) order to create repeatable builds for a file system test appliance, so I started digging a bit. Looking at the debi

Re: Potential MBF: packages failing to build twice in a row

2023-08-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2023-08-05 at 17:06 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I wonder what we should do, because 5000+ failing packages is a lot... Add a message about this on tracker.debian.org for affected packages? > Should we give up on requiring a 'clean' target that works? After all, > when 17% of packages

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 11:42 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > An additional check with some overlap would be whether >    pkgconf --cflags .pc > returns 0 for every pkgconfig file in a package. piuparts runs adequate, which runs something similar:    pkg-config --exists --print-errors .pc It emits mi

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 18:32 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Manual opt-in for our > 11k -dev packages is a significant cost > that would have to be justified by the people who oppose opt-out. You could use the Janitor to do automatic opt-in where it works, IIRC the Janitor runs autopkgtests before f

Re: Potential MBF: packages failing to build twice in a row

2023-08-08 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 05:29:34PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I think it's somewhat inevitable that code paths that aren't frequently > exercised don't work. If a majority of maintainers are doing all of > their builds with git-buildpackage, or dgit --clean=git, or something > basically equival

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-08 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Sune, On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 06:46:38AM -, Sune Vuorela wrote: > I don't think this is a important problem that some headers might have > special conditions for use. I'd rather have our developers spend time > fixing other issues than satisfying this script. A while ago, I've performed a

Re: Q: How to set DMARC record for .debian.net?

2023-08-08 Thread Kentaro Hayashi
Hi, DB Change Request is blocked like this: > Command is not understood. Halted - no changes committed As v=DMARC1 entry is not recognized, you can set DMARC for external record (_dmarc.foobar.xx.) and set IN CNAME as a workaround for debian.net. (I've found this way via ldapsearch via ldap

Re: snapshot.d.o has been in a bad state for several months

2023-08-08 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Hi, > > snapshot.debian.org is getting worse again. There is not a single snapshot for > August yet and the last days of July are spotty: > > http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/?year=2023&month=7 > > None

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 09:19:16AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 11:35:01AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 06:46:38AM -, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > On 2023-08-07, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > > while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ h

Blockchain Technology: Transforming Energy Maintenance and Sustainability

2023-08-08 Thread Nina Sumner
Hi there, I recently visited "Energy Maintenance: Ensuring Efficiency and Sustainability" (https://www.playdeb.net/energy-maintenance/) and thought the way you covered the role of governments in promoting energy conservation through policies and regulations was really interesting. It's not ofte

Bug#1043288: ITP: qad -- A simple, REST-API compliant daemon for automated testing

2023-08-08 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sudip Mukherjee X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com * Package name: qad Version : 0.0~git20230710.75f9d50 Upstream Contact: James Thomas Scott Clarke * URL : https://gitla

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 11:35:01AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 06:46:38AM -, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2023-08-07, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ header compilations > > > for armhf time_t [1], I noticed a common pattern:

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 06:43:36PM +, Benjamin Drung wrote: >... > I propose to add an autodep8 test for C/C++ header files that tries to > compile the header file. This will catch issues like missing > dependencies and other issues. >... An additional check with some overlap would be whether

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 06:46:38AM -, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2023-08-07, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > while working a whole week on fixing failing C/C++ header compilations > > for armhf time_t [1], I noticed a common pattern: The library -dev > > packages was missing one or more dependencies o

Re: autodep8 test for C/C++ header

2023-08-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 09:17:18PM +, Benjamin Drung wrote: > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 22:52 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: >... > > 1) The library has a "main" header file that must be included before > >any of the others, and it does not come first in lexicographical > >order. It may defin