Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org,
charlesmel...@riseup.net
* Package name: golang-github-serialx-hashring
Version : 0.0~git20190422.8b29126-1
Upstream Author : Sung-jin Hong
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
* Package name: golang-github-serialx-hashring
Version : 0.0~git20190422.8b29126-1
Upstream Author : Sung-jin Hong
* URL : https://github.com/serialx/hashring
* License : Expat
Programming La
On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 10:37 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> [BCCed to OpenCL ICD implementation package maintainers]
>
> I noticed that some packages have a dep on specific OpenCL ICD
> packages, but don't dep on the opencl-icd virtual package(s).
> Presumably any of the OpenCL ICDs work for most packag
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joseph Nahmias
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, mojohaus-...@googlegroups.com,
pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, j...@nahmias.net
* Package name: maven-native
Version : 1.0-alpha-11
Upstream Contact: mojohaus-...@goo
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 11:44 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> On 17/06/2023 20.30, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > This is what I would do if the archive policy demands it. Won't affect
> > transitional dhcpcd5 or dhcpcd-base.
>
> Ack.
>
> I'm not sure whether the transitional dhcpcd5 package should
[BCCed to OpenCL ICD implementation package maintainers]
I noticed that some packages have a dep on specific OpenCL ICD
packages, but don't dep on the opencl-icd virtual package(s).
Presumably any of the OpenCL ICDs work for most packages?
$ grep-aptavail --no-field-names --show-field Package --f
Hi,
this is the call for the next video conference of the Debian Med team
that are an established means to organise the tasks inside our team.
Meetings usually take us only 15-20min depending what we are talking
about and how many people are joining. The next meeting is tomorrow
https:/
On 17/06/2023 20.30, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
This is what I would do if the archive policy demands it. Won't affect
transitional dhcpcd5 or dhcpcd-base.
Ack.
I'm not sure whether the transitional dhcpcd5 package should have a
versioned dependency on the "right" dhcpcd, either
(= 1:${binary:
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 6:39 PM Guillem Jover wrote:
> By reading #594672 and a quick skim over #551034, these seem to have
> been the same project, but the version introduced later as dhcpcd5 was
> a new major version with an incompatible redesign, which would break
> on upgrade, that's why it wa
Hi David,
* David Kalnischkies [2023-06-17 13:23]:
fwiw apt would trigger this in its autopkgtest as one of them (the
main run-tests) builds a sub-directory of helpers with cmake via the
main "upstream" CMakeList.txt file. That test is allowed to have stderr
output through, so no problem on tha
On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 21:41:50 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> After thinking about it, I'd like to suggest the following approach.
>
> - dpkg with the new default behavior uploaded to experimental
> - libraries uploaded to experimental with the new package names (so, NEW
> processing gets done)
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-06-17 at 11:39:51 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine, on 2023-06-16:
> > Someone filed a bug asking to re-introduce an epoch.
> >
> > An older fork of the same package back in Wheezy last featured the epoch.
> >
> > Personally, I'm fine with either marking the bu
On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 12:40 PM Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine, on 2023-06-16:
> > Someone filed a bug asking to re-introduce an epoch.
> >
> > An older fork of the same package back in Wheezy last featured the epoch.
> >
> > Personally, I'm fine with either marking the bug as WONTFI
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 01:08:08AM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Attached is a list of most likely affected packages, which
> I generated with a code search for
>
> (?i)cmake_minimum_required\s*\(\s*version\s*(?:3\.[01234]|2)(?:[.)]|\s)
fwiw apt would trigger this in its autopkgtest as one of
Hi Martin-Éric,
Martin-Éric Racine, on 2023-06-16:
> (non-subscriber, please keep me in CC)
Acknowledged.
> Someone filed a bug asking to re-introduce an epoch.
>
> An older fork of the same package back in Wheezy last featured the epoch.
>
> Personally, I'm fine with either marking the bug as
15 matches
Mail list logo
