Le jeu. 8 juin 2023 à 05:31, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 11:45 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> > 2. i386 as a multiarch foreign architecture to run legacy binaries on
> >modern x86_64 systems
> >2a. legacy native Linux i386 binaries
> >2b. legacy Windows i386 binarie
On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 11:45 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> 2. i386 as a multiarch foreign architecture to run legacy binaries on
> modern x86_64 systems
> 2a. legacy native Linux i386 binaries
> 2b. legacy Windows i386 binaries via Wine (which requires a somewhat
> complete i386 Li
On 2023-06-07 Paul Wise wrote:
[...]
> There was another option mentioned earlier in the thread that could
> help resolve some aspects of these conflicts; make 32-bit arches
> (or just i386) support both time_t ABIs, like glibc and Linux do.
> The 64-bit time_t ABI would be the default but the 32
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 18:17:44 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 05:34:56AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Enabling time64 explicitly is what also had first come to my mind,
> > which does not seem too onerous if all the debhelper override
> > disappears? :) Then NEW proc
Hi, late on the thread, but...
On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 19:51, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>
> [Please CC me in replies as I'm not subscribed to this list]
>
> I hope I'm not too late for this discussion ...
>
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > >On Fri, 19 May 2023 at 12:42, Steve Mc
> On 2023-06-07, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2023-06-07, Paul Wise wrote:
>> I note that there are a number of packages available on i386 but not
>> available on amd64, is anyone planning on an MBF about this issue?
> I got curious. Some of them are hurd specific. Others are a i386
>
On 2023-06-07 at 03:19, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2023-06-07, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 09:33 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>>
>>> I've been reading the discussion around i386 a bit and found the
>>> direction it has taken a little unproductive.
>>
>> I note that there are a number
On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 at 07:19:39 -, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2023-06-07, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I note that there are a number of packages available on i386 but not
> > available on amd64, is anyone planning on an MBF about this issue?
>
> game stuff, mostly contrib, likely binary data for binar
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023, at 09:19, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> lisp runtie. unsure why restricted
>> cmucl deb lisp optional arch=i386
>> cmucl-clm deb lisp optional arch=i386
cmucl contains a compiler and is self hosting (the compiler is used to create
the new version of the environment). x86 is th
On 2023-06-07, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 09:33 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
>> I've been reading the discussion around i386 a bit and found the
>> direction it has taken a little unproductive.
>
> I note that there are a number of packages available on i386 but not
> available on a
10 matches
Mail list logo
