Hello,
On Wed 10 May 2023 at 11:47PM +02, Ansgar wrote:
> Cool, then let's ask tech-ctte.
>
> Dear ctte, please consider overruling the dpkg maintainer to include
> the patch from #994388[1].
>
> Thanks,
> Ansgar
>
> [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/994388#397
This would require a new, maintainer-
Package: tech-ctte
X-Debbugs-Cc: Russ Allbery , Sean Whitton
, Helmut Grohne , Luca Boccassi
, debian-d...@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 14:36 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ansgar writes:
> > Debian going out of its way to tell derivative users to switch b
Ansgar writes:
> On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 13:50 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Caring about them isn't the same thing as doing everything they want.
>> We can both try to make things as smooth for them as possible and still
>> make design decisions about Debian that they may disagree with or that
>>
Hi Russ,
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 13:50 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ansgar writes:
> > As far as I understand, we do explicitly *not* care about our
> > derivatives with regard to merged-/usr as some packages in Debian
> > recommend users to move *away* from merged-/usr to split-/usr on
> > derivat
Ansgar writes:
> So why do we allow changes that require listing all reverse dependencies
> in Breaks then? This is known to be wrong for all non- listed packages,
> e.g., all local/vendor/derivative-specific packages.
Because it's a balance; we don't want to stop making changes, and never
makin
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 08:35 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sun 07 May 2023 at 11:14AM +02, Ansgar wrote:
> > Debian's dependency system requires to explicitly declare
> > Depends/Conflicts/Replaces/Breaks, but for obvious reasons we
> > cannot do
> > that for packages outside Debian's ecosystem.
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicolas Boulenguez
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, 689...@bugs.debian.org,
990...@bugs.debian.org
* Package name: dh-builtusing
Upstream: native Debian package, I am the author
Version : 0.0.1
* URL : https:
Hello,
On Tue 09 May 2023 at 02:07AM +01, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> But again, I do think we need to try and define what it is that we
> want to support here. If we are serious about it, then we should
> codify it, and hold any future changes to the same standards, wherever
> they may come from. If
Hello,
On Sun 07 May 2023 at 11:14AM +02, Ansgar wrote:
> Debian's dependency system requires to explicitly declare
> Depends/Conflicts/Replaces/Breaks, but for obvious reasons we cannot do
> that for packages outside Debian's ecosystem.
>
> The same is true for diversions/alternatives/* or anyth
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:41 AM Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <
rica...@ribalda.com> wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 1:03 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> >
> > Upstream respond without objection. Is there any volunter to this
> transition? If not i would happy to work on it.
>
> I ca
Package: general
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
This bug report is a rather minor issue, but it is an inconvenience for me.
I realize that auto logout is a general security feature, but in my
case, I have a secrure environment where only my wife and I have access to
my computer. I strong prefe
Hi Emmanuel
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 1:03 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote:
>
> Upstream respond without objection. Is there any volunter to this
> transition? If not i would happy to work on it.
I can take care of it. I won't probably start until the weekend though
Regards
>
> Cheers
>
>
> El mar
12 matches
Mail list logo
