Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

2023-05-06 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Luca, On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 09:47:15PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Sure, there are some things that need special handling, as you have > pointed out. What I meant is that I don't think we need special > handling for _all_ affected packages. AFAIK nothing is using > diversions for unit files

Bug#1035651: ITP: node-jupyterlab-nbformat -- Node.js modules for JupyterLab

2023-05-06 Thread Yadd
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Yadd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-jupyterlab-nbformat Version : 4.0.0~rc1 Upstream Contact: https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab/issues * URL : https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab * Li

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

2023-05-06 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Sat 06 May 2023 at 09:47PM +01, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Sat, 6 May 2023 at 19:51, Helmut Grohne wrote: >> >> > - the moratorium on moving files from bin/ sbin/ lib/ _and_ to other >> > packages at the same time is maintained from bookworm till trixie, and >> > will lifted after trixi

Bug#1035633: ITP: node-license-webpack-plugin -- node-webpack plugin to manage third-party license

2023-05-06 Thread Yadd
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Yadd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-license-webpack-plugin Version : 4.0.2 Upstream Contact: https://github.com/xz64/license-webpack-plugin/issues * URL : https://github.com/xz64/license-webpack-

Bug#1035626: ITP: 3d-ascii-viewer-c -- Viewer of 3D models in ASCII

2023-05-06 Thread Gürkan Myczko
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Gürkan Myczko X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: 3d-ascii-viewer-c Version : 1.1.0 Upstream Authors: Francisco Javier Andrés Casas Barrientos URL : https://github.com/autopawn/3d-ascii-viewer-c * Licen

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

2023-05-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 6 May 2023 at 19:51, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > I fear you are still missing too many relevant details. What sounds like > a simple plan is severely broken if carried out in this simple form. It > disappoints me that you continue to present it as this simple given the > earlier

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

2023-05-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 6 May 2023 at 19:51, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 04:52:30PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > To have a working system you need several more steps that are > > performed by the instantiator/image builder, such as providing working > > and populated proc/sys/

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

2023-05-06 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Luca, On Sat, May 06, 2023 at 04:52:30PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > To have a working system you need several more steps that are > performed by the instantiator/image builder, such as providing working > and populated proc/sys/dev, writable tmp/var, possibly etc. And it > needs to be instan

Q: does archive.d.o have enough resource for old docker images?

2023-05-06 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, Just a question about archive.debian.org. Some users who uses oldold...stable for their docker images recommend to use archive.d.o, but I wonder whether archive.d.o is expected to use such way (in the sense of heavy traffic). Does archive.d.o has enough spec for that? -- Regards, H

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

2023-05-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 6 May 2023 at 16:11, Simon Richter wrote: > > Hi, > > On 06.05.23 21:28, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > [shipping usrmerge symlinks in packages] > > > In the far future I'd like for these details to be owned by image > > builders/launchers/setup processes rather than a package, but this can > >

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

2023-05-06 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On 06.05.23 21:28, Luca Boccassi wrote: [shipping usrmerge symlinks in packages] In the far future I'd like for these details to be owned by image builders/launchers/setup processes rather than a package, but this can be discussed separately and independently, no need to be tied to this ef

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

2023-05-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 6 May 2023 at 11:00, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Fri, 05 May 2023 at 23:11:54 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > In practice, I suspect that out of ~2000 packages shipping bin/ sbin/ > > lib*/, only a small fraction would end up needing to further move > > files out to other packages > > I t

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

2023-05-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 6 May 2023 at 06:21, Simon Richter wrote: > > Hi, > > On 06.05.23 07:11, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > - every package is forcefully canonicalized as soon as trixie is open > > for business > > You will also need to ship at least > > - /lib -> usr/lib (on 32 bit) > - /lib64 -> usr/lib64 (

Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg

2023-05-06 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 05 May 2023 at 23:11:54 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > In practice, I suspect that out of ~2000 packages shipping bin/ sbin/ > lib*/, only a small fraction would end up needing to further move > files out to other packages I think the most common case for this is likely to be systemd system