Re: 32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-09 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-02-09 17:32:08) > El 9/2/23 a las 15:37, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues escribió: > > I wanted to bring fakeroot bugs #1023286 and #1030638 to the attention of a > > wider audience because even though I filed these bugs, > > Thanks for bringing this up! > > Can

Work-needing packages report for Feb 10, 2023

2023-02-09 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 1215 (new: 0) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 162 (new: 0) Total number of packages reques

Re: 32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-09 Thread Santiago Vila
El 9/2/23 a las 15:37, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues escribió: I wanted to bring fakeroot bugs #1023286 and #1030638 to the attention of a wider audience because even though I filed these bugs, Thanks for bringing this up! Can you confirm if all this is correct? - Only packages uploaded af

32bit arch packages are built with wrong ownership due to fakeroot bug

2023-02-09 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, I wanted to bring fakeroot bugs #1023286 and #1030638 to the attention of a wider audience because even though I filed these bugs, I do not see myself finding the time to track down and correct their consequence for all the source package builds that happened since their introduction with the

Bug#1030928: ITP: nerdctl -- nerdctl is a Docker-compatible CLI for containerd.

2023-02-09 Thread Han Xu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Han Xu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, suyanh...@gmail.com * Package name: nerdctl Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Akihiro Suda * URL : https://github.com/containerd/nerdctl * License : Apache License 2.0

Re: Security (Was: OpenMPI 5.0 to be 32-bit only ?)

2023-02-09 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi, The push-back from upstream is that they're unconvinced anyone is actually using i386 for MPI. For example, MPI is configured to use PMIx but its thought that doesn't work on 32-bit, but no bugs have been reported. Either we increase our 32-bit testing regime, or realistically consider

Re: OpenMPI 5.0 to be 32-bit only ?

2023-02-09 Thread Alastair McKinstry
On 07/02/2023 10:27, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2023-02-07 10:54, Alastair McKinstry wrote: Hi I've been pinged by the upstream maintainer of OpenMPI    Jefff Squyres as to our opinions on maintaining 32-bit support. See a  thread here: https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/11282 If 32-bit