Hi!
I was aware that non-free firmware packages would be moving to the new
non-free-firmware archive area [1] and that people are working hard to
update the webpages as well [2].
But I don't recall seeing any announcement (for users of unstable)
that existing packages (see attached list) have beg
Holger Wansing (2023-01-28):
> I did not find any mention of ath9k-htc firmware in the list of
> packages you identified for this apptoach,
Sure, that package is in main, so doesn't need to move from non-free to
non-free-firmware so wasn't on that list. :)
> which made me ask for this. Sorry for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: debian-edu-router
Version : 2.12.0
Upstream Author : Mike Gabriel
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org/debian-edu/debian-edu-router/
* License : GPL-2+
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Exeldro
* Package name: obs-gradient-source
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Exeldro
* URL : https://obsproject.com/forum/resources/gradient-source.1172
* L
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephan Lachnit
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, stephanlach...@debian.org
* Package name: clad
Version : 1.1
Upstream Contact: Vassil Vassilev
* URL : https://github.com/vgvassilev/clad
* License : LGPL-3.0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: aiojobs
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Contact: Andrew Svetlov.
* URL : https://github.com/aio-libs/aiojobs
* License : Apache2
Programming Lang: Pyt
Enviado desde mi iPhone
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 29/1/23 a las 9:56, Sebastian Ramacher escribió:
On 2023-01-28 15:55:05 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Historically, we have not treated FTBFS bugs as falling into the category
of mass bug filing or requiring this pre-discussion. Various folks have
been mass-filing FTBFS bugs near the release fr
On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 13:43 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> What you call current practice is only current debootstrap behaviour.
Current practice is to use Build-Depends to specify build dependencies
in a way that the buildd network will successfully build packages. The
data might also be of (limit
El 28/1/23 a las 14:41, Ansgar escribió:
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
I think the much more interesting question is in what environment we want to
build our packages in. Currently, on buildds, we build them in a chroot that
has Priority:required and build-essential because of (what I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arto Jantunen
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: radicale-dovecot-auth
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Contact: Arvedui
* URL : https://github.com/Arvedui/radicale-dovecot-auth
* License : GPL-3
Progr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bas Wijnen
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, wij...@debian.org
* Package name: python-lua
Version : 0.4
Upstream Contact: Bas Wijnen
* URL : https://github.com/wijnen/python-lua
* License : AGPL3+
Programmin
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 05:00:56AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 21:35:01 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I don't think such arguments are bringing us forward,
> > we should rather resolve the problem that these differ.
> >
> > All/Most(?) packages where they do differ are pack
On 2023-01-28 15:55:05 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Sebastian Ramacher writes:
>
> > As with all mass bug filings, discuss the issue first on debian-devel.
> > See developer's reference 7.1.1. This discussion could have both
> > answered the questions whther RC severity is appropriate for this ty
15 matches
Mail list logo
