Scott Talbert writes:
> In one of the library packages I maintain (hidapi), upstream removed a
> couple of global variables (my .symbols file noticed this). See
> abipkgdiff below.
> Does this break ABI? My assessment is that it does NOT, but I would
> like to confirm. These variables were no
In one of the library packages I maintain (hidapi), upstream removed a
couple of global variables (my .symbols file noticed this). See
abipkgdiff below.
Does this break ABI? My assessment is that it does NOT, but I would like
to confirm. These variables were not declared in a header file, s
Control: tags 1029085 + wontfix
Control: close 1029085
Hi Scott,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:52:49PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It's not policy compliant, which may be okay in this instance, but it
> certainly isn't ideal.
I looked into this and figured that indeed the Debian Policy has a
s
On January 17, 2023 2:39:32 PM UTC, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>Hi Jonathan,
>
>Thanks for your review.
>
>On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:12:10PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> I'm not sure that alternatives is appropriate, if the commands are not
>> interchangeable. And they are not: if you have 1 &
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for your review.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:12:10PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I'm not sure that alternatives is appropriate, if the commands are not
> interchangeable. And they are not: if you have 1 & 2 installed on a
> host, and have used one to create some backups, t
(setting CC according to X-Debbugs-CC, not sure if appropriate since
posting via -devel, but well, I don't think we should have ITP's on
-devel anyway.)
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 02:32:13PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
The root of this ITP is #1019950.
The crux of the matter is that borg 2.x is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, guilherme@gmail.com,
debian-security-to...@lists.debian.org, si...@factosec.nl
* Package name: depix
Version : 0.0~git20220716
Upstream Contact: Sipke Mellem
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 08:52:50AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 00:55 +0100, Tobias Wackenhut wrote:
>
> > What would be the cleanest way to package the new version with the
> > mentioned patch?
>
> Ask the extension author to get the patch included into the upstream
> rt5 cor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gosa-plugins-ldapmanager
Version : 2.8~
Upstream Author : GONICUS GmbH
* URL : https://github.com/gosa-project/gosa-plugins-ldapmanager
* License :
9 matches
Mail list logo