Sam Hartman left as an exercise for the reader:
> Yes, absolutely.
> I am familiar with nis/PAM/shadow/LDAP, have deployed NIS (although not
> nisplus), and have been around long enough to understand the issues.
>
> It is absolutely reasonable to expect people who need to do so to
> unshadow their
Hello,
I have started a machine translation from
https://ddp-team.pages.debian.net/dpb/BuildWithGBP.pdf at
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/dpb.
I know that this is not a good translation. It should first help to
understand what is written there.
Help from native speakers is very welcome.
P
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 09:18:59AM -0500, nick black wrote:
>Marc Haber left as an exercise for the reader:
>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 21:11:40 -0500, nick black
>> wrote:
>> >i'm absolutely not suggesting we stop supporting NIS or other
>> >programs which rely on unshadowed passwords. it's a big ol'
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 02:35:06AM +0100, Ángel wrote:
> I would change that to:
Please don't. If we change the distribution default for
net.ipv4.ping_group_range, then ping should refrain from ever trying to
check for it and never make the executable privileged.
Bastian
--
There is a multi-le
4 matches
Mail list logo
