On Sun, 11 Sep 2022 11:08:44 -0400, Marvin Renich
wrote:
>* Ansgar [220910 09:37]:
>> the transition to usrmerge as described in [1] is planned to start
>> around 2022-09-15 (next Thursday).
>[snip]
>> We will send an announcement to debian-devel-announce@ once the upload
>> to unstable happens.
On Sun, 2022-09-11 at 23:07 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Architecture lists containing all 64bit ports or all little endian
> ports create much extra work for anyone adding support for a new
> 64bit little endian architecture.
Since dpkg already knows about the bits and endianness of ports,
perhap
Hi,
Am 11.09.22 um 22:07 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 05:08:57PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
...
The issue we see is that some DDs end up setting a hardcoded list in
the "Architecture" field, rather than just letting builds keep failing
on these archs (and then possibly succe
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 05:08:57PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>...
> The issue we see is that some DDs end up setting a hardcoded list in
> the "Architecture" field, rather than just letting builds keep failing
> on these archs (and then possibly succeeding after some time whenever
> somebody co
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 09:25:40PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Paul Gevers, le dim. 11 sept. 2022 21:16:08 +0200, a ecrit:
> >
> > - color packages that "never" had a successful built on an architecture
> > different. That information is already available because that's what marks
> > the pack
Paul Gevers, le dim. 11 sept. 2022 21:16:08 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 11-09-2022 17:08, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > We could for instance:
> > - Add an Architecture-FTBFS field to debian/control
> > - Add an environment variable to debian/rules so that on these archs dh
> >fails with a different exit
Hi Samuel,
On 11-09-2022 17:08, Samuel Thibault wrote:
We could for instance:
- Add an Architecture-FTBFS field to debian/control
- Add an environment variable to debian/rules so that on these archs dh
fails with a different exit code that buildds would notice.
- Add a Architecture-FTBFS fiel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-bsm-go-vlq
Version : 0.0~git20150828.ec6e8d4
Upstream Author : Dimitrij Denissenko
* URL : https://github.com/bsm/go-vlq
* License
* Ansgar [220910 09:37]:
> the transition to usrmerge as described in [1] is planned to start
> around 2022-09-15 (next Thursday).
[snip]
> We will send an announcement to debian-devel-announce@ once the upload
> to unstable happens.
What is the point in waiting until after the upload to send to
Hello,
We have been discussing a bit on #debian-ports about packages that fail
to build on less-mainstream architectures.
The issue we see is that some DDs end up setting a hardcoded list in
the "Architecture" field, rather than just letting builds keep failing
on these archs (and then possibly s
Hi,
Quoting Josh Triplett (2022-09-11 15:26:52)
> Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> > What do you think? Is this the right solution to the problem? A few more
> > bits
> > about DPKG_ROOT as well as alternative solution proposals (including
> > rejected
> > ones) can be found on this wik
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> What do you think? Is this the right solution to the problem? A few more bits
> about DPKG_ROOT as well as alternative solution proposals (including rejected
> ones) can be found on this wiki page:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/Spec/InstallBootstr
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 03:09:07PM +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
> Stuffing them behind a command, possibly making them online only in the
> process will arguably make system troubleshooting and administration
> harder,
> esp. if the system has connectivity issues.
>
> >>>
> On 11 Sep 2022, at 14:59, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 02:41:24PM +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:11:38PM +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
While all looks good and feels sound from many aspects, I have some
reservations against treat
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 02:41:24PM +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:11:38PM +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
> >> While all looks good and feels sound from many aspects, I have some
> >> reservations against treating changelogs as metadata.
> >>
> >> Current changelogs as fi
Hi,
in 2016 we filed our first DPKG_ROOT patch #824594 against base-files. The dpkg
version at the time just had included support for the DPKG_ROOT variable being
set for maintainer scripts and we were excited to try out this new feature for
creating foreign architecture chroots. At the time we th
Hi Andrey,
> On 6 Sep 2022, at 12:42, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 12:11:38PM +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
>> While all looks good and feels sound from many aspects, I have some
>> reservations against treating changelogs as metadata.
>>
>> Current changelogs as files h
Hi all fellow Debian developers,
Duplicated work is silly and learning you've done it feels frustrating,
so let's try avoid that by a) communicating when initiating a work and
b) checking first if others have already begun same work.
For Debian packages, we have since long established a method to
18 matches
Mail list logo
