Re: General resolution: non-free firmware

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 08:28:15PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Steve McIntyre dixit: > > >Please go and *read* and *respond* in debian-vote. The discussion is > >there, not here. > > I wrote where the Reply-To pointed to. Perhaps if that had been > correct… It was clearly written that the di

Re: General resolution: non-free firmware

Steve McIntyre dixit: >Please go and *read* and *respond* in debian-vote. The discussion is >there, not here. I wrote where the Reply-To pointed to. Perhaps if that had been correct… >You've utterly missed Phil's point about people not seeing or hearing >boot options. I didn’t. I pointed out th

Re: General resolution: non-free firmware

Thorsten Glaser wrote: >Phil Morrell dixit: >>> Is there support for something like A but not enabled by default? >>> That is, you have to actively select a nōn-default option >>I don't believe so, because that doesn't solve the problem at hand. How >>exactly do you select a non-default option if

Re: Comments on proposing NEW queue improvement (Re: Current NEW review process saps developer motivation

On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:15:27 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >If I look at a package and determine it's only in New due to a new binary >package name and that means the project has prohibited me from looking for >other issues in the package until some time later when it's not in New, then I >feel

Re: Bug#1018759: ITP: sd - intuitive find and replace CLI

On 2022/8/30 19:00, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 06:44:36PM +0800, Blair Noctis wrote: An RFP is at #1016929 [1]. 1: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016929 You should have retitled and owned the

Bug#1018761: ITP: tealdeer - simplified, example based and community-driven man pages

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Blair Noctis X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, n...@sail.ng * Package name    : tealdeer   Version : 1.5.0   Upstream Author : Danilo Bargen * URL : https://github.com/dbrgn/tealdeer * License : MIT or Apache-2.0   P

Re: Bug#1018759: ITP: sd - intuitive find and replace CLI

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 06:44:36PM +0800, Blair Noctis wrote: > An RFP is at #1016929 [1]. > > 1: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016929 > You should have retitled and owned the RFP instead of creating a separate ITP. Y

Bug#1018759: ITP: sd - intuitive find and replace CLI

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Blair Noctis X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, n...@sail.ng * Package name    : sd   Version : 0.7.6   Upstream Author : Gregory * URL : https://github.com/chmln/sd.git * License : MIT   Programming Lang: Rust   Desc

Re: Current NEW review process saps developer motivation

On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 09:27:44 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > It occurred to me that if the compiler/linker could be made to generate > the GI data and then something else split it out of the binary (similar > to how debug symbols work) then this issue could potentially be solved, > does that sound fea

Re: GObject-Introspection and cross-compilation

On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 11:58:40 +0100, Wookey wrote: > Something of an aside from the current debate, but GObject > introspection introduced significant problems with cross-compiling > because the introspection process produces different results when done > on different architectures so you couldn'