Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marc Dequènes (Duck)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Control: block -1 with 1010247
* Package name: wlgreet
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Kenny Levinsen
* URL : https://git.sr.ht/~kennylevinsen/wlgreet
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marc Dequènes (Duck)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: greetd
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Kenny Levinsen
* URL : https://git.sr.ht/~kennylevinsen/greetd
* License : GPL-3
Programming La
On 2022-04-26 at 18:05, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 20:41 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
>> secure boot signing process at Microsoft is a review-sign process
>
> What kind of review are Microsoft doing of the Debian shim?
>
> Are they reviewing the source and checking for a reproduc
On 2022-04-26 at 10:14, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 18:21:47 +0100, Steve McIntyre
> wrote:
>> Alternatively, people can build replacement shim-signed packages
>> using their own root of trust if desired. If we had a large enough
>> number of users wanting a different root of trust,
On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 20:41 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> secure boot signing process at Microsoft is a review-sign process
What kind of review are Microsoft doing of the Debian shim?
Are they reviewing the source and checking for a reproducible build?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/Pau
Moin
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:14:02PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 18:21:47 +0100, Steve McIntyre
> wrote:
> >We don't have good docs around this in general (hey, it's security
> >software - it's against the law to write good and complete docs!), but
> >I've certainly discusse
Marc Haber wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 18:21:47 +0100, Steve McIntyre
>
>>Better than that, our shim-signed source package always double-checks
>>things here. At build time it removes the Microsoft signature and
>>compares that shim binary to the binary that we submitted for
>>signing. We would sp
On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 16:04 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 13:54:59 +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> > Why?
>
> If only I knew. I myself don't feel to comfortable to rely on
> Microsoft being able to pull the plug on us any time. I don't know
> whether they can, but I imagine some kind of r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Jodogne
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: orthanc-neuro
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Sebastien Jodogne
* URL : https://book.orthanc-server.com/plugins/neuro.html
* License : GPL
P
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 18:21:47 +0100, Steve McIntyre
wrote:
>We don't have good docs around this in general (hey, it's security
>software - it's against the law to write good and complete docs!), but
>I've certainly discussed this with a few folks over the years.
It would be great to have that writ
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 13:54:59 +0200, Ansgar wrote:
>On Sat, 2022-04-23 at 12:21 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> >Is the presence of shim-signed on the install media enough to make
>> >people feel somehow contaminated?
>>
>> I think so, yes. Personally, I don't care too much but i can
>> understand why
Dear developers,
if like to here an opinion from the useer side, please listen.
I made many installations of debian in the last years, mostly notebooks
preinstalled with windows. What often lacks is, that on many newer notebooks
the network card is not accessible. Either due of missing firmware
On 4/26/22 12:08, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:59:20AM +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
No, they do not. Most popular devices won't work at all without non-
free firmware, including boring things such as mass storage (SD cards,
SSD, HDD, ..., and controllers), input device
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:59:20AM +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
> > No, they do not. Most popular devices won't work at all without non-
> > free firmware, including boring things such as mass storage (SD cards,
> > SSD, HDD, ..., and controllers), input devices (keyboards, mice, ...).
>
> Yeah, y
> On 26 Apr 2022, at 11:30, Ansgar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 10:47 +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
>> While I understand where you're coming from, I don't think such thing
>> is necessary, because a) Most popular devices with non-free firmware
>> blobs already work without such firmware
>
On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 10:47 +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
> While I understand where you're coming from, I don't think such thing
> is necessary, because a) Most popular devices with non-free firmware
> blobs already work without such firmware
No, they do not. Most popular devices won't work at al
On 4/26/22 09:12, Ansgar wrote:
On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 23:48 +0300, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
While what you’re saying is technically true, the default selection
means much more than a default. It’s defines the stance of Debian, as
a whole.
[...]
So, if Option 5 is adopted, the default state is
17 matches
Mail list logo
