Hi Gard,
Am Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 02:29:44PM +0100 schrieb Gard Spreemann:
> I don't have push access to the repo, but feel free to add that I can
> probably join on the 18th and on the 20th of February, if you end up
> picking 18-20.
You can push now and we are happy that you intend to join
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org,
francisco.ruvi...@riseup.net, math...@calenhad.com
* Package name: golang-github-google-gousb
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Google
John Goerzen writes:
> On Tue, Feb 01 2022, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>> I would hate to entirely lose the quality review that we get via NEW, but
>> I wonder if we could regain many those benefits by setting up some sort of
>> peer review system for new packages that is less formal and less
>> bottl
Dear list,
On 02/02/2022 18:46, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 10:16:36PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:39:11AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> Doesn't that, then, lead to the suggestion tha
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 10:16:36PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:39:11AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> Doesn't that, then, lead to the suggestion that any package entering
> unstable without having underg
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:39:11AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> > Doesn't that, then, lead to the suggestion that any package entering
> > unstable without having undergone NEW review (which, in the revised
> > model, might be every n
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:39:11AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
Doesn't that, then, lead to the suggestion that any package entering
unstable without having undergone NEW review (which, in the revised
model, might be every new package) should automatically have a bug filed
against it requesting sui
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:39:11AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> >>> I would hate to entirely lose the quality review that we get via
> >>> NEW, but I wonder if we could regain many those benefits by
> >>> setting up some sort of peer review system for new packages that
> >>> is less formal and less
On 2022-02-02 at 11:21, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 09:39:02AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 01 2022, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>
>>> I would hate to entirely lose the quality review that we get via
>>> NEW, but I wonder if we could regain many those benefits by
>>> s
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 09:39:02AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01 2022, Russ Allbery wrote:
I would hate to entirely lose the quality review that we get via NEW, but
I wonder if we could regain many those benefits by setting up some sort of
peer review system for new packages that i
On Tue, Feb 01 2022, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I would hate to entirely lose the quality review that we get via NEW, but
> I wonder if we could regain many those benefits by setting up some sort of
> peer review system for new packages that is less formal and less
> bottlenecked on a single team tha
On Wed, 2022-02-02 at 13:44 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Wookey,
>
> Am Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:07:21PM + schrieb Wookey:
> > Has anyone on the actual FTP team responded to this thread yet?
> > (sorry, I can't remember who that is currently)
> >
> > Either on Andreas's original simple que
Andreas Tille writes:
> Hi again,
>
> I've just created a preliminary Sprint page[2]. At the top I've added a
> table to summarise first responses of participants about the date.
> Seems we have a vague preference for the date 2022-02-18 - 2021-02-20.
>
> I'd be really happy if more interested
Hi Wookey,
Am Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:07:21PM + schrieb Wookey:
> Has anyone on the actual FTP team responded to this thread yet? (sorry, I
> can't remember who that is currently)
>
> Either on Andreas's original simple question: 'Do we still _have_ to keep the
> binary-NEW thing?'
> Or thi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yadd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libauthen-webauthn-perl
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Lemonldap::NG Team
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Authen-WebAuthn
* License : GPL-2+
Progr
Hi again,
I've just created a preliminary Sprint page[2]. At the top I've added a
table to summarise first responses of participants about the date.
Seems we have a vague preference for the date 2022-02-18 - 2021-02-20.
I'd be really happy if more interested people would show up and add
the pref
16 matches
Mail list logo
