[I'm the Debian ntpsec maintainer.]
On 1/18/22 11:21 AM, Paride Legovini wrote:
> I'd prefer making ntp a dummy package depending on ntpsec rather than
> having src:ntpsec takeover bin:ntp.
If I understand correctly, you're suggesting src:ntp builds bin:ntp that
is a dummy package which depends
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen
* Package name: golang-github-arceliar-phony
Version : 0.0~git20210209.dde1a8d-1
Upstream Author : Arceliar
* URL : https://github.com/Arceliar/phony
* License : MPL-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen
* Package name: yggdrasil-go
Version : 0.4.2-1
Upstream Author : Yggdrasil Network
* URL : https://github.com/yggdras
Marco d'Itri wrote on 18/01/2022:
> On Jan 18, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> If "ntp" the binary package would become a transitional package that
>> installs chrony, that'd be fine with me if that eases the transition.
> I am not sure that this would be practical since they cannot share the
> same c
On Jan 18, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I think Fedora prefers chrony instead of ntpsec.
Fedora even uses btrfs, so who cares. :-)
The interesting point is that RHEL switched to chrony for RHEL 7.
Also, I want to add that chrony is not just better as a client, but also
as a NTP server.
https://engine
Am 18.01.22 um 19:44 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
However, development for ntp.org is slow, upstream still using BitKeeper
is cumbersome, and even the testsuite needs to be fixes on some
architectures for new releases. Both ntpsec and chrony are (from my POV)
the better al
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> However, development for ntp.org is slow, upstream still using BitKeeper
> is cumbersome, and even the testsuite needs to be fixes on some
> architectures for new releases. Both ntpsec and chrony are (from my POV)
> the better alternatives now. To a point where I would
Bernhard Schmidt wrote on 17/01/2022:
> ntpsec and ntp should be largely configuration compatible, so even a
> takeover of the binary package names might be practical.
I played a bit with ntpsec some time ago, I remember being very pleased
with it, and I think it can very well replace ntp in Book
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: cwl-upgrader
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Common Workflow Language contributors
* URL : https://
On 1/17/22 21:13, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 17, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
What do you think?
chrony is MUCH better since Debian 10, I agree that it should be the
preferred NTP client for when systemd-timesyncd is not enough.
You can definitely spend your time on something more fun and more
use
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, codeh...@debian.org
* Package name: pyobjcryst
Version : 2.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Prof. Simon Billinge
* URL : https://github.com/diffpy/pyobjcryst
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, guilherme@gmail.com
* Package name: cisco7crack
Version : 0.0~git20121221.f1c21dd-1
Upstream Author : Davide Madrisan
* URL : https://github.com/
Andreas Tille writes:
...
> As far as I understood Phil's last posting he is working on an enhanced
> tasksel.
Actually, what I've been working on is infrastructure to allow others to
contribute to such an effort.
I've recently enabled a CI pipeline in the tasksel master branch, so
anyone forki
13 matches
Mail list logo
