[CC me please]
Dear DDs,
I am staring at:
* https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001136
One can verify that sh4 build went fine for this upload:
*
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openvdb&arch=sh4&ver=9.0.0-3&stamp=1638662998&raw=0
It should be noticed that, this
Dear Madam/Sir, Hello! We have obtained your requirements on the Internet and
are writing to enquire whether you would be willing to establish business
relations with us. We are luojiang Hengxue Sanitary Products Co., Ltd. from
Quanzhou city, China. For many years, our company specializes in the
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libsymbol-get-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Felipe Gasper (FELIPE)
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Symbol-Get
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libcall-context-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Felipe Gasper (FELIPE)
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Call-Con
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 05-12-2021 03:36, Andres Salomon wrote:
>> So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on d-release
>> that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a discussion
>> about ending security support for it in stable.
>
> The problem really
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ocaml-x509
Version : 0.15.2
Upstream Author : David Kaloper and Hannes Mehnert
* URL : https://github.com/mirleft/oc
Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:56AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Hi Andres,
>
> On 05-12-2021 03:36, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on
> > d-release that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a
> > discussion about ending
> Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:56AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> > The problem really is lack of maintenance. In my opinion, chromium deserves
> > an active *team* to support it in Debian.
[..]
> > We'll not ship it in bookworm unless we see steady uploads
> > in unstable and we see security uploa
On 2021-12-03 00:51, Paul Wise wrote:
> The one issue I can think of with using release-monitoring.org is that
> Debian becomes more reliant on an external service, while currently we
> are completely independent of other distros for version checking.
>
> Converting the release-monitoring.org che
On 05/12/2021 10:26, Timo Röhling wrote:
Hi Yadd,
thank you very much for your work on uscan. That new version 5
format looks really promising.
* Yadd [2021-12-01 09:11]:
* Version 5:
* Main (first) paragraph contains "Version: 5" and optional options
that change default values for sour
Hi Andres,
On 05-12-2021 03:36, Andres Salomon wrote:
So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on
d-release that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a
discussion about ending security support for it in stable. I'm willing
to help out with chromium pac
Hi Yadd,
thank you very much for your work on uscan. That new version 5
format looks really promising.
* Yadd [2021-12-01 09:11]:
* Version 5:
* Main (first) paragraph contains "Version: 5" and optional options
that change default values for source-paragraph
* URL and regex are separat
12 matches
Mail list logo
