On 3.9.2021 19.02, Marc Haber wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 01:10:17PM +, Domagoj Bazina wrote:
This package is not available in Debian 11 distribution, and version from older
Debian 10 can't be installed. Is there any replacement for this package, or are
there any plans for implementatio
2021, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 3 8:22:51 AM IST, Jonas Smedegaard ൽ എഴുതി
>I am very worried about how complex node-* packages in Debian have
>become since ftpmasters explicitly stated a not-too-small rule and we
>began more aggressively embedding. E.g. version of each embedded
>project is hidden by defau
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 01:10:17PM +, Domagoj Bazina wrote:
> I have question about freeipa-client, that packages was available as
> apt-package in Debian 10, also it can be found in Sid option,
> https://pkgs.org/search/?q=freeipa-client.
Freeipa was removed from Debian 11 due to a long-sta
Hello,
I have question about freeipa-client, that packages was available as
apt-package in Debian 10, also it can be found in Sid option,
https://pkgs.org/search/?q=freeipa-client.
This package is not available in Debian 11 distribution, and version from older
Debian 10 can't be installed. Is t
Phil Morrell dijo [Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 02:04:44AM +0100]:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 01:03:35AM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > - should a package debian/control list bundled dependencies to make
> > sure to avoid duplications ?
>
> Maybe? I noted in my final paragraph that Fedora has a mechanism for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guido Günther
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: libadwaita
Version : 1.0.0~alpha.2
Upstream Author : Alexander Mikhaylenko and more
* URL : https://gitlab
* Tomas Pospisek [210903 08:27]:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993488#16 contains a
> "wontfix + close" but no rationale. Which leaves the original reporter with
> a large "?" I guess.
>
> I am guessing that the reason for the "wontfix" is "that's just how Unix
> works unfor
On 2021-09-03 14:23, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993488#16 contains a
"wontfix + close" but no rationale. Which leaves the original reporter
with a large "?" I guess.
I am guessing that the reason for the "wontfix" is "that's just how
Unix works unfort
Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> I am guessing that the reason for the "wontfix" is "that's just how
> Unix works unfortunately" aka "that's a Unix design bug"? Is my guess
> correct?
I would call it a "Unix design decision" or even an "OS design
decision", because Windows (of the NT variant) has made th
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993488#16 contains a
"wontfix + close" but no rationale. Which leaves the original reporter
with a large "?" I guess.
I am guessing that the reason for the "wontfix" is "that's just how Unix
works unfortunately" aka "that's a Unix design bug"?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aloïs Micard
* Package name: golang-github-containous-alice
Version : 0.0~git20171023.03f45bd-1
Upstream Author : Containous
* URL : https://github.com/containous/alice
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Descripti
Hi,
On 03.09.21 13:11, Simon Richter wrote:
[Revocation mechanism]
If we don't have one, shouldn't we worry more about that given the
widespread use of TLS?
We have a big hammer, shipping a new ca-certificates package. If we want
something that only affects apt, but not other packages, that mec
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ecmwflibs
Version : 0.13.3
Upstream Author : European Centre for Medium-Range Forecasts
* URL : https://github.com/ecmwf/ecmwflibs
* License :
On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 13:11 +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> > > - If I deselect all CAs in the configuration dialog of the
> > > ca-certificates package, what mechanism will allow apt to work?
>
> > If people intentionally detrust them, they have to deal with the
> > fallout.
>
> So this introdu
Hi,
On 02.09.21 23:02, Ansgar wrote:
As it is now, I can install a Debian system where no X.509
certificate authorities are trusted.
That doesn't change with the proposal?
- If I deselect all CAs in the configuration dialog of the
ca-certificates package, what mechanism will allow apt
On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 at 02:46:20 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I suspect that it helps if separating reasons for _encouraging_
> embedding (tiny upstream projects and deeply integrated sets of
> upstreams, I guess) from reasons for _discouraging_ embdding (all other
> cases, I guess).
If the
Le jeudi 2 septembre 2021, 22:38:35 UTC Phil Morrell a écrit :
> Over this last year there seems to have been a noticeable divergence of
> maintainer opinion, on what has become known as vendoring, from a strict
> reading of [policy 4.13]. I think it's notable that the heading is
> [Embedded] copie
17 matches
Mail list logo
