Re: ARM architectures

On 06/06/2021 11:43, Aaron Dewes wrote: I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a way supported by a Debian Developer I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually, or is there a build script to verify the images)? Does the RPi4 is totally

Re: Figuring how to work with team-maintained packages on salsa

Am Freitag, dem 04.06.2021 um 19:43 +0200 schrieb Florian Weimer: > I want to add a few patches to this repository: > >   > > Surely there must be some tool support to help with that?  I know how > to do it manually (perhaps even involving quilt).  Has

Re: Figuring how to work with team-maintained packages on salsa

Hi Sean, On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 11:40:47AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > If you want to produce patches/commits to share with the maintainer, > then `dgit clone` enables you to work with arbitrary packages in a > homogeneous way, regardless of adoption of `dgit push`. It can also > help you NMU;

Re: Figuring how to work with team-maintained packages on salsa

Hello, On Sun 06 Jun 2021 at 11:20AM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Helmut, > > On Fri 04 Jun 2021 at 08:49PM +02, Helmut Grohne wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 07:43:59PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> I want to add a few patches to this repository: >>> >>>

Re: Figuring how to work with team-maintained packages on salsa

Hello Helmut, On Fri 04 Jun 2021 at 08:49PM +02, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 07:43:59PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> I want to add a few patches to this repository: >> >> >> >> Surely there must be some tool support to help with

Re: Seeking feedback on a meta package builder

Hi, On Fri, 04 Jun 2021, Helmut Grohne wrote: > This is very sad. The whole point of me reaching out where was > specifically trying to avoid this kind of fragmentation and now you're > adding to it. While mdbp also is an implementation, it first and > foremost is an API and I'd hope that it would

Re: ARM architectures

On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 12:43:53 +0200, Aaron Dewes wrote: >> I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a >> way supported by a Debian Developer > >I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually, >or is there a build script to verify the images)? Guido h

Re: ARM architectures

Marc Haber wrote... > On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 10:50:20 +0200, Christoph Biedl > wrote: > >For me, the biggest downside of the RPi4 is the need for an extra power > >plug as they take up to three amps - while for example a BananaPi can be > >powered using some unused USB (<= 3.0) port. > > Mine run vi

Bug#989529: ITP: neochat -- Client for Matrix chat

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Norbert Preining X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org * Package name: neochat Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : 2020 Carl Schwan 2020 Noah Davis 2020 Tobias Fel

Bug#989528: ITP: kquickimageeditor -- Image editing components

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Norbert Preining X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org * Package name: kquickimageeditor Version : 0.1.3 Upstream Author : Carl Schwan * URL : https://invent.kde.org/libraries/kquickimageedi

Bug#989527: ITP: python-markuppy -- module to generate HTML/XML content

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Carsten Schoenert X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-markuppy Version : 1.14 Upstream Author : Tyler Bakke * URL : https://pypi.org/project/MarkupPy * License : MIT public-domain Program

Re: Bug#989524: RFP - Bugdom - An OpenSource Port of Pangea Software's Bugdom for modern systems

Control: reassign -1 wnpp Control: severity -1 wishlist On Du, 06 iun 21, 10:59:03, Sarah wrote: > Package: Bugdom  > > > Project Page: > https://github.com/jorio/Bugdom > > > > License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 > > International Public License (> > > https://gi

Re: Bug#989523: RFP - Nanosaur - An OpenSource Port of PangeaSoft‘s MacOS Game for modern systems

Control: reassign -1 wnpp Control: severity -1 wishlist On Du, 06 iun 21, 10:58:32, Sarah wrote: > Package: Nanosaur > > Project Page: > https://github.com/jorio/nanosaur > > > > Context: Nanosaur is a 1998 Macintosh game by Pangea Software. In it, > > you’re a cybernetic dinosaur from the future

Re: ARM architectures

On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 12:43 +0200, Aaron Dewes wrote: > > I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in > > a > > way supported by a Debian Developer > > I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built > (Manually, > or is there a build script to verify the images)

Re: ARM architectures

On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 12:43:53PM +0200, Aaron Dewes wrote: > > I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a > > way supported by a Debian Developer > > I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually, > or is there a build script to verify the images

Re: ARM architectures

I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a way supported by a Debian Developer I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually, or is there a build script to verify the images)? Does the RPi4 is totally 64 bit ? It can run plain Debian arm64. Is

Re: ARM architectures

On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 05:44:21 +, Paul Wise wrote: >On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:28 PM Marc Haber wrote: > >> I haven't advanced to package cross-building yet. > >Some resources related to that: > >http://crossqa.debian.net/ >https://wiki.debian.org/CrossCompiling Thanks! Greetings Marc -- ---

Re: ARM architectures

On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 13:19:10 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: >I think you didn't get much what I said... Probably. >If you'd have took time to explain the real reason behind why choosing a >RPi4 maybe a good idea versus simply saying they are better than other >choices. Then I would

Re: ARM architectures

Hello, hope this works, am not normally subscribed to debian-devel > If you'd have took time to explain the real reason behind why choosing a > RPi4 maybe a good idea versus simply saying they are better than other > choices. Then I would have considered much more knowledgeable your > opinions and

Re: ARM architectures

On Sb, 05 iun 21, 19:01:36, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:04:45PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > The PINE A64+ (2 GB RAM) is very stable for me, unless I put significant > > load on the USB connection (specifically *heavy* writing to an external > > HDD in a powered enclo