Re: Seeking feedback on a meta package builder

2021-06-02 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Alex, On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 05:07:16PM +0200, Alex Muntada wrote: > This reminded me of my using of ccache and eatmydata in sbuild. > They may not be relevant for the context of mdbp depending on > the resources available for building, indeed. > > I'm pretty fond of them because they speed u

Re: Seeking feedback on a meta package builder

2021-06-02 Thread Alex Muntada
Hi Helmut, > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:26 AM Helmut Grohne wrote: > > > Some aspects that you may want to set for a build are: Paul said: > What to run in the build environment at each stage. This reminded me of my using of ccache and eatmydata in sbuild. They may not be relevant for the conte

Re: Seeking feedback on a meta package builder

2021-06-02 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Paul, On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 01:00:55AM +, Paul Wise wrote: > > Some aspects that you may want to set for a build are: > > Looking at my pbuilder configs, some more: Note that you are not a computer program. The thing I'm working on is not supposed to be run by humans, but by other tools

Re: Seeking feedback on a meta package builder

2021-06-02 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Raphaƫl, On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 09:12:24AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 31 May 2021, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > I see this tight coupling as a problem for mainly two reasons. > [...] > > * As tasks grow, there is a desire to distribute builds to multiple > >machines. As such, the

Re: Seeking feedback on a meta package builder

2021-06-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 31 May 2021, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I see this tight coupling as a problem for mainly two reasons. [...] > * As tasks grow, there is a desire to distribute builds to multiple >machines. As such, the various tools typically grow their own >strategy for moving build tasks betwee