Re: Thanks and Decision making working group (was Re: General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board result)

2021-04-18 Thread Yao Wei (魏銘廷)
Hi, > Benda Xu 於 2021年4月19日 11:40 寫道: > > The winning option "Debian will not issue a public statement on this > issue" implies that the majority of DDs is not interested in such > non-technical affairs. Such a working group will distract us from > achieving technical excellence. > Most of th

Re: Thanks and Decision making working group (was Re: General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board result)

2021-04-18 Thread Benda Xu
Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Carter writes: > On 2021/04/18 13:20, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> The details of the results are available at: >> https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 > > Thanks for all your work on this vote, I believe that you made excellent > decisions as proje

RE: Thanks and Decision making working group (was Re: General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board result)

2021-04-18 Thread Brian Thompson
> Is it really still an open question whether Debian is a political> project that has opinions on non-technical topics like the board of the> FSF or the legal status of Taiwan, Palestine and Kosovo, or whether> Debian is a technical project where people of diverse backgrounds and> political opinion

Bug#987171: ITP: libdumbtts -- Helper library for dumb speech synthesizers

2021-04-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Samuel Thibault X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-accessibil...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libdumbtts Version : 0.3.2 Upstream Author : Bohdan R. Rau * URL : http://www.polip.com/files/ * License

Re: Thanks and Decision making working group (was Re: General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board result)

2021-04-18 Thread Donald Norwood
On 4/18/21 9:56 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Is it really still an open question whether Debian is a political > project that has opinions on non-technical topics like the board of the > FSF or the legal status of Taiwan, Palestine and Kosovo, or whether > Debian is a technical project where people of

Re: Thanks and Decision making working group (was Re: General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board result)

2021-04-18 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On Sun, 2021-04-18 at 14:04 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > > However, I don't think we're quite in a position to pat ourselves on the > back here. This vote has once again highlighted some problems in our > methods for making decisions. I think that we should set up a working > group to specifica

Re: Thanks and Decision making working group (was Re: General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board result)

2021-04-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 02:04:38PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: >... > While this vote caught a lot of heat, essentially it's quite a trivial > vote. Ultimately it had become a question of if and how we should > respond to an external situation. I think that as Debian grows, as the > free software

Bug#987150: ITP: sfsexp -- small and fast s-expression parsing library

2021-04-18 Thread David Bremner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: David Bremner X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: sfsexp Version : 1.3 Upstream Author : Matthew Sottile * URL : https://github.com/mjsottile/sfsexp/ * Lic

Thanks and Decision making working group (was Re: General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board result)

2021-04-18 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hi Kurt On 2021/04/18 13:20, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote: > The details of the results are available at: > https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 Thanks for all your work on this vote, I believe that you made excellent decisions as project secretary and it seems that all views

Re: i386 baseline issue for Go packages in Bookworm

2021-04-18 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 5:18 AM Tianon Gravi wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 10:10, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > 1. Raise the i386 baseline to SSE2. > > 2. Downgrade the Go packages to softfloat. > > 3. Build all Go packages with GCCGO on i386. > > We've been setting "GO386=387" since src:golang wa