Bug#894821: updated upstream snuffleupagus git repo

2021-02-28 Thread Federico Grau
Control: retitle -1 ITP: snuffleupagus -- Security module for php7 - Killing bugclasses and virtual-patching the rest Control: owner -1 donf...@casagrau.org

Bug#983742: ITP: boolean.py -- boolean algebra library for Python

2021-02-28 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jelmer Vernooij X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: boolean.py Version : 3.8 Upstream Author : * URL : https://github.com/bastikr/boolean.py * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: Python D

Bug#983741: ITP: license-expression -- parse, compare, ' 'simplify and normalize license expressions (such as SPDX license ' 'expressions) using boolean logic.

2021-02-28 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jelmer Vernooij X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: license-expression Version : 1.2 Upstream Author : * URL : https://github.com/nexb/license-expression * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang:

Re: New service: https://debuginfod.debian.net

2021-02-28 Thread Timo Röhling
* Paul Wise [2021-02-27 23:15]: I assume folks are wanting a per-user consent to download from debuginfod services instead of or in addition to the per-system consent being proposed to add via debconf. I strongly prefer the debconf solution only. Companies tend to have policies which police

Re: New service: https://debuginfod.debian.net

2021-02-28 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 07:22:07AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sat, 2021-02-27 at 17:30 -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > I don't know if I understand the pushback I'm seeing > > against using a debconf question for this. > > FWIW I don't think I've read any actual pushback on that in th