Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: nicoo
* Package name: golang-filippo-edwards25519
Version : 1.0.0-beta.2-1
Upstream Author : Filippo Valsorda
* URL : https://github.com/FiloSottile/edwards25519
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Descripti
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 07:18:42PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html#soft mentions
> """
> Please note that packages that are in bullseye at the start of the soft
> freeze can still be removed if they are buggy. This can happen manually
> o
Hi Holger,
On 30-01-2021 18:41, Holger Levsen wrote:
> bsdowl is marked for autoremoval on Februay 20th but the autoremoval
> will not happen as that date is after the soft freeze, after which
> autoremovals
> will not ahappen anymore.
https://release.debian.org/bullseye/free
Hi David, and thanks for your thorough reply and explanation!
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:15:01PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> To refine this: apt¹ picks the first alternative which is either:
> 1. already installed and satisfying as is
> 2. already installed, but needs an upgrade to satisfy
hi,
so, after me doing 540 no-source-change source-only NMUploads in December 2020
and 2940 in January 2021 we've come down from >3500 binary packages in bullseye
which were not built on buildds to 11. That's pretty awesome! [1]
(It also means that currently I have uploaded >10% of all of Debian,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Savchenko
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, and...@savchenko.net
* Package name: vivid
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : David Peter
* URL : https://github.com/sharkdp/vivid
* License : MIT
Programmin
Le samedi 23 janvier 2021 à 21:22:02+0100, Geert Stappers a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 04:30:00PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> > Le samedi 23 janvier 2021 à 16:23:47+0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> > > On Jan 23, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> > >
> > > > While I appreciate your point
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:53:50PM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2021-01-27 16:15:17)
> > I suspect that's not really the case - that instead apt tools might pick at
> > random.
>
> no, apt does not pick at random. The apt solver prefers the first alte
8 matches
Mail list logo