On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:44:36AM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2021/01/28 01:49, Daniel S. wrote:
> > The hope would be that, after collecting a 5 figure sum has been
> > donated, paid developers work on freeing the most common firmware(s).
>
> If that was enough to free up firmware, we'd p
On 2021/01/28 01:49, Daniel S. wrote:
> The hope would be that, after collecting a 5 figure sum has been
> donated, paid developers work on freeing the most common firmware(s).
If that was enough to free up firmware, we'd probably have figured out a
way to pay that right away without even spending
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:49:43AM +0100, Daniel S. wrote:
> * Consider donating $25 to our __free-WiFi-fund__ to free your adapter
> firmware
What fund?
> This gives visibility to the actual problem and the only true solution.
What true solution?
> It works towards a future, where the free image
On 1/27/21 12:58 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
> For step 2 someone needs to request a binNMU
>
> reportbug release.debian.org -> binNMU
>
> See also https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU
>
> Best
>
Thank you (for the info, and processing the binNMU)!
Antonio
OpenPGP_0xB01C53D5DED4A4EE.asc
Desc
I'd like to propose a solution that helps both, the user and Debian:
Add a message like this on the downloads page:
##
NOTE:
This image does not provide unfree WiFi firmware.
If you have a WiFi adapter, it will most likely not work. (__learn more__)
* Consider using __this__ image
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Felix Yan
* Package name: golang-github-phpdave11-gofpdf
Version : 1.4.2-1
Upstream Author : Dave Barnes
* URL : https://github.com/phpdave11/gofpdf
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : A PDF docum
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:20:06 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 January 2021 23:18:07 CET Felix Lechner wrote:
> > While we often change tag names (or combine tags etc.), the majority
> > of the renames people talk about seems to stem from two bug reports by
> > third parties asking
Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2021-01-27 16:53:50)
> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2021-01-27 16:15:17)
> > I suspect that's not really the case - that instead apt tools might
> > pick at random.
>
> no, apt does not pick at random. The apt solver prefers the first
> alternative.
With t
Hi,
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2021-01-27 16:15:17)
> I suspect that's not really the case - that instead apt tools might pick at
> random.
no, apt does not pick at random. The apt solver prefers the first alternative.
> It is my understanding that build daemons _ignore_ secondary entries
> exact
Quoting Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer (2021-01-27 15:09:41)
> So most packages now have an alternative dependency like libqt5gui5
> (>= 5.x) | libqt5gui5-gles (>= 5.x). The strange thing is that *some*
> users upgrading from stable or reinstalling packages [1] get the -gles
> variant inste
Hi!
tl;dr: we the Qt maintainers need help to find out why some users
upgrading from stable / reinstalling packages get libqt5quick5-gles
instead of libqt5quick5.
Long story: some months ago my team mate Dmitry Shachnev managed to
get two flavours of Qt: the normal one with OpenGL support and the
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 02:20:06PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 January 2021 23:18:07 CET Felix Lechner wrote:
> > While we often change tag names (or combine tags etc.), the majority
> > of the renames people talk about seems to stem from two bug reports by
> > third parties as
On Thursday, 21 January 2021 23:18:07 CET Felix Lechner wrote:
> While we often change tag names (or combine tags etc.), the majority
> of the renames people talk about seems to stem from two bug reports by
> third parties asking that we make tag names more consistent (bug
> numbers are available,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jirawat Iamsamang
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-protobufjs
Version : 6.10.2
Upstream Author : Daniel Wirtz
* URL : https://protobufjs.github.io/protobuf.js/
* License : BSD-3-Clause
P
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:59:48PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote...
>
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:34:14PM +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
> > > * Package name: root
> > [...]
> > >
> > > I want to maintain ROOT in the science team. ROOT was already in Debian as
> > > `
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: doas
Version : 6.8
Upstream Author : Duncan Overbruck znc others
* URL : https://github.com/Duncaen/OpenDoas
* License : bsd
Programming Lang: c
Description : mi
On Wednesday, 27 January 2021 1:40:56 AM AEDT Russell Coker wrote:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libselinux
>
> libselinux isn't being built on ia64, it says "BD-Uninstallable (Extra-
> Depends: python3-all-dev (>= 3.8.6-1))".
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=
17 matches
Mail list logo
