Package: libpam-modules
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
The new pam 1.4.0 has switched pam_unix from libnsl.so.1 (in libc6) to
libnsl2 and libtirpc3, which brings those packages into the
pseudo-Essential set. This is a rather sub
Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 14:55:17 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > I'm talking about packaging xyz 1.3.1 and 2.0.1, as separate xyz-1 and
> > xyz-2 packages, and allowing the use of both in build dependencies.
>
> This is not all that rare even for C/C++ code, as exemplified by
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 01:22:16AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I agree, an "open" program should ask to the server what the media type of the
> URL is, and pass it to the default program able to handle it.
I also wish it were that simple.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ hol
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>>> Le Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 04:27:17AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
Since `eog http://example.com/image.png` will open the image,
shouldn't an "open" program ask to the server what the media type
of the URL is, and pass it to the default program able
On Mon, 2020-12-28 at 14:09 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:58:10PM +, Lyndon Brown wrote:
> > ...
> > The problem with using testing as a rolling distro is that the
> > package
> > migration process often causes big delays that can block upgrades
> > that
> > include sec
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 03:20:35PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 02:55:17PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >...
> > If you want to package abc version 1.2.3, and among many other things,
> > abc depends on xyz version 2.1.4, and xyz has a new version 3.0.1 now,
> > it makes sen
Charles Plessy writes:
> I went ahead and uploaded to Sid mime-support version 3.68, which
> provides /usr/bin/open as a symbolic link to /usr/bin/run-mailcap
> using the alternatives system, at a priority of 30. I welcome other
> alternatives.
This is good news. Thank you. :)
I've used "open
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Neville
* Package name: netr
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Ed Neville
* URL : http://www.usenix.org.uk/content/net.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Rust
Description : Display network interface th
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 02:09:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The internet is full of people who "envision" things, and who claim it
> "would surely not be burdensome" if other people would do the actual
> work for them.
>
> If you want this to happen, it is you who will have to implement and
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 02:55:17PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>...
> If you want to package abc version 1.2.3, and among many other things,
> abc depends on xyz version 2.1.4, and xyz has a new version 3.0.1 now,
> it makes sense to work with the upstream of abc, sending them a patch to
> migrate
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:58:10PM +, Lyndon Brown wrote:
>...
> The problem with using testing as a rolling distro is that the package
> migration process often causes big delays that can block upgrades that
> include security fixes, making use of testing alone thus a big security
> risk.
Deb
On Lu, 28 dec 20, 06:46:51, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:58 PM Lyndon Brown wrote:
>
> > The problem with using testing as a rolling distro
>
> Your mail reminded me about Constantly Usable Testing:
>
> https://cut.debian.net/
Or "bob":
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/20
On 2020/12/28 01:04, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> I think Debian stable users should enable automatic upgrades (IIRC
>> that is the case now). Debian unstable/testing users should probably
>> only enable safe upgrades that don't remove packages.
>
> I'm pretty sure it's not default because the security t
On Вс, 2020-12-27 at 22:58 +, Lyndon Brown wrote:
> As I envision it, we could have "rolling" and maybe "rolling-unstable"
> (or "rolling-testing") with continual upgrades typically going directly
> into "rolling", or with a 0-day migration from "rolling-unstable", with
> the purpose of "rollin
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 21:57:17 +0100, Richard
wrote:
>I for now do not deny or admit officially. Marc, are you someone with
>authority?
No, I am just probably the last one on this list who is not ignoring
you. Not ignoring you was a mistake. Fixed now. I apologize for paying
and attention.
--
---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cyril Brulebois
* Package name: golang-github-go-playground-validator-v10
Version : 10.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Go Playgound
* URL : https://github.com/go-playground/validator
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Des
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cyril Brulebois
* Package name: golang-github-go-playground-assert-v2
Version : 2.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Go Playgound
* URL : https://github.com/go-playground/assert
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description
17 matches
Mail list logo
