Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:11 PM Richard Laager wrote: > I would expect that: > > 1. main builds include main repositories > 2. contrib builds include main, contrib, & non-free repositories > 3. non-free builds include main, contrib, & non-free repositories AFAICT, we don't use separate chroots f

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

On 9/30/20 4:45 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > The > official buildds, for packages in main, seem to include contrib but > not non-free binary packages in the chroot's apt sources.list files. > Both contrib and non-free source packages are available in the chroots > apt sources.list files. This appears to

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:48 PM Philipp Kern wrote: > Somewhat ironically not depending on anything but main is also true for > non-free and contrib. (At least when you want it to be built by the > official builders.) That doesn't appear to be the current situation on the buildds. The official bu

Bug#971512: ITP: rpma -- remote pmem access library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Borowski X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: rpma Version : 0.9 Upstream Author : Intel * URL : https://github.com/pmem/rpma * License : BSD-3 Programming Lang: C Description : remote

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

On 30.09.20 22:45, Josh Triplett wrote: > [Accidentally sent this early before it was finished.] > > Roland Fehrenbacher wrote: >>> "S" == Sven Joachim writes: >> S> In addition, the packages in *main* >> S> >> S> * must not require or recommend a package outside of *main* for >>

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

Roland Fehrenbacher wrote: > > "S" == Sven Joachim writes: > S> In addition, the packages in *main* > S> > S> * must not require or recommend a package outside of *main* for > S> compilation or execution (thus, the package must not declare a "Pre- > S> Depends", "Depen

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

[Accidentally sent this early before it was finished.] Roland Fehrenbacher wrote: > > "S" == Sven Joachim writes: > S> In addition, the packages in *main* > S> > S> * must not require or recommend a package outside of *main* for > S> compilation or execution (thus, the pack

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

Roland Fehrenbacher writes: >> "S" == Sven Joachim writes: > S> No, see Policy §2.2.1: > S> In addition, the packages in *main* > S> > S> * must not require or recommend a package outside of *main* for > S> compilation or execution (thus, the package must not declare

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

Quoting Roland Fehrenbacher (2020-09-30 20:47:58) > > "S" == Sven Joachim writes: > > Hi Sven and Adam, > > many thanks for your quick answers. > > S> On 2020-09-30 19:31 +0200, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> a quick question to the list, since I didn't find

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

Roland Fehrenbacher, le mer. 30 sept. 2020 20:47:58 +0200, a ecrit: >Is the only solution here then really to have two source packages > with exactly the same upstream source and only a difference in > the way the binaries are built and what they depend upon? That's what I do with starpu and hwloc

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

> "S" == Sven Joachim writes: Hi Sven and Adam, many thanks for your quick answers. S> On 2020-09-30 19:31 +0200, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote: >> Hi, >> >> a quick question to the list, since I didn't find an answer after >> a significant time of searching: >> >>

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 19:31 +0200, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote: > a quick question to the list, since I didn't find an answer after a > significant time of searching: > > Is it allowed to have a source package with a build dependency on a > pkg in non-free (in this particular case nvidia-cuda-toolki

Re: Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

On 2020-09-30 19:31 +0200, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote: > Hi, > > a quick question to the list, since I didn't find an answer after a > significant time of searching: > > Is it allowed to have a source package with a build dependency on a pkg in > non-free (in this particular case nvidia-cuda-toolki

Allowed to build-depend a pkg in main on a pkg in non-free?

Hi, a quick question to the list, since I didn't find an answer after a significant time of searching: Is it allowed to have a source package with a build dependency on a pkg in non-free (in this particular case nvidia-cuda-toolkit) and resulting binary packages to go partly to main and others to

Bug#971417: ITP: ngms -- NG Media Server is a powerful host media processing solution enabling application developers to quickly build real time audio and video services. With NG Media Server, connect

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: NG Media * Package name: ngms Version : 6.0 Upstream Author : NG MEDIA * URL : https://n-g-media.com * License : Proprietary Programming Lang: C++ Description : NG Media Server is a powerful host media processing

Bug#971416: ITP: exec-helper -- Or How To Get Your Coffee In Peace: A meta-wrapper for executing tasks on the command line

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bart Verhagen X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, barrie.verha...@gmail.com * Package name: exec-helper Version : 0.6.0 Upstream Author : Bart Verhagen * URL : https://github.com/exec-helper/source * License : B