Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bitlbee-libpurple
Version : 3.6-1.1+b2
Upstream Author :
* URL or Web page :
* License :
Description : Missing /var/lib/bitlbee
I've not yet configured bitl-bee, just installed it.
I ran systemctl to check the statu
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:06 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Better: we must mandate binary uploads, rebuild them, and make sure they
> are reproducible. Then get the buildd upload the binary they build (or
> the one from the uploader, since that's the same thing...).
>
> When the package isn't reprodu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
* Package name: golang-github-alexcesaro-log
Version : 0.0~git20150915.61e6862-1
Upstream Author : Alexandre Cesaro
* URL : https://github.com/alexcesaro/log
* License : Expat
Programmi
Hi Michael,
> I just fell into the trap (again) and uploaded a binary package instead of
> sources only. We don't want the binaries to be uploaded, that much I get, but
> could anyone please explain to me, why we still accept binary uploads and why
> no tool in the whole chain gives as much as a w
On Du, 12 iul 20, 03:56:57, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 11, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > > (Way more people should switch from wpa_supplicant to iwd.)
> >
> > Difficult when network-manager depends (not recommends) wpa-supplicant:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/919619
> How to switch to iwd:
>
>
On 7/14/20 3:55 PM, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just fell into the trap (again) and uploaded a binary package instead of
> sources only. We don't want the binaries to be uploaded, that much I get, but
> could anyone please explain to me, why we still accept binary uploads and why
> no tool i
On 7/14/20 4:21 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 1:56 PM Michael Meskes wrote:
>
>> I just fell into the trap (again) and uploaded a binary package instead of
>> sources only. We don't want the binaries to be uploaded, that much I get, but
>> could anyone please explain to me, why we
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gtherm
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Guido Gunther
* URL : https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/gtherm
* License : GPLv3+ and LGPLv2.1+
Pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yann Dirson
* Package name: apery
Version : WCSC28+git20191114
Upstream Author : Hiraoka Takuya
* URL : https://github.com/HiraokaTakuya/apery
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Strong AI for pla
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 2:56 PM Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just fell into the trap (again) and uploaded a binary package instead of
> sources only. We don't want the binaries to be uploaded, that much I get, but
> could anyone please explain to me, why we still accept binary uploads and w
> Personally, I think we should discard binaries from all sourceful
> uploads and only accept binaries from binary-only uploads such as the
> uploads done by the buildds.
>
> https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5ec2e979cd7d7ec9bf386fbf77e3399c7aeeb473.ca...@debian.org
Agreed, that would be the
> You still need to produce binary packages unfortunately if you
> upload
> something to NEW or binary-NEW.
Sure, but that could be checked for as well.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber:
Quoting Marc Haber (2020-07-14 16:05:28)
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 03:56:57 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >On Jul 11, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> >> > (Way more people should switch from wpa_supplicant to iwd.)
> >>
> >> Difficult when network-manager depends (not recommends) wpa-supplicant:
> >> h
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:21:30PM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 1:56 PM Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> > I just fell into the trap (again) and uploaded a binary package instead of
> > sources only. We don't want the binaries to be uploaded, that much I get,
> > but
> > could anyon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
We are pleased to announce beta release 2.69b of GNU Autoconf.
This release includes eight years of development work since the
previous release, 2.69. See below for the detailed list of changes
since the previous version, as summarized by the NEWS
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 15:55, Michael Meskes wrote:
Hi,
I just fell into the trap (again) and uploaded a binary package
instead of
sources only. We don't want the binaries to be uploaded, that much I
get, but
could anyone please explain to me, why we still accept binary uploads
and why
n
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 03:56:57 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>On Jul 11, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> > (Way more people should switch from wpa_supplicant to iwd.)
>>
>> Difficult when network-manager depends (not recommends) wpa-supplicant:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/919619
>How to switch to iwd:
>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, Michael Meskes wrote:
I just fell into the trap (again) and uploaded a binary package instead of
sources only. We don't want the binaries to be uploaded, that much I get, but
could anyone please explain to me, why we still accept binary uploads and why
no tool in the whole c
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 1:56 PM Michael Meskes wrote:
> I just fell into the trap (again) and uploaded a binary package instead of
> sources only. We don't want the binaries to be uploaded, that much I get, but
> could anyone please explain to me, why we still accept binary uploads and why
> no to
Hi,
I just fell into the trap (again) and uploaded a binary package instead of
sources only. We don't want the binaries to be uploaded, that much I get, but
could anyone please explain to me, why we still accept binary uploads and why
no tool in the whole chain gives as much as a warning, let alon
Quoting Russell Stuart (2020-07-13 00:16:01)
> On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 22:12 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> > I don't run either systemd or NetworkManager, and I'm not currently
> > interested in changing either of those things, but I am interested
> > in trying out an alternative to wpa_supplicant.
Quoting Luca Capello (2020-07-14 13:44:17)
> Hi there,
>
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 19:15:47 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2020-07-12 20:35:56 +0200 (+0200), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > [...]
> > > What is (unusual but) usable, however, is to *not* use Network
> > > Manager for wifi, but use IWD+
Hi there,
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 19:15:47 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2020-07-12 20:35:56 +0200 (+0200), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> [...]
> > What is (unusual but) usable, however, is to *not* use Network
> > Manager for wifi, but use IWD+systemd or IWD standalone for wifi,
> > and use Network M
Package: wnpp
Owner: Balint Reczey
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: grpc-proto
Version : 0.0~git20200526.dd2dca3
Upstream Author : https://github.com/grpc/grpc-proto
* URL : https://github.com/grpc/grpc-proto
* License
24 matches
Mail list logo
