On 22/03/20 at 20:32 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Hi!
> There's a bunch of packages that fail to repack their sources. That is,
> "dpkg-buildpackage -S" fails in a clean environment.
>
> I've tested the entire archive, invoking:
> sbuild -s --source-only-changes --no-arch-all --no-arch-any
>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:34 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> Hello,
> ratt (rebuild all the things, https://packages.debian.org/sid/ratt) is
> really interesting but it's sometimes hard to use effectively on
> personal resources: some packages have tens, if not hundreds of
> reverse dependencies, and ru
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:42 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
> hmmm, i'm not sure about that, comments below
Sure, neither exactly match right now, but could potentially be
tweaked to do what you want.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
> This sounds similar to a couple of other things:
hmmm, i'm not sure about that, comments below
> The archive testing that Lucas Nussbaum does using donated cloud resources:
this is archive-wide and executed seldomly, not on a per-package,
on-demand basis
> https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.or
The puppet source package, recently recently dropped the puppet-common binary
package. This package has been a transitional dummy package since stretch.
Unfortunately there are still a substantial number of packages depending on it.
They are listed by maintainer at the end of this mail (the lis
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:34 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
> thoughts?
This sounds similar to a couple of other things:
The archive testing that Lucas Nussbaum does using donated cloud resources:
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/ArchiveTesting
Luca Falavigna's Deb-o-Matic service:
https://debom
Hello,
ratt (rebuild all the things, https://packages.debian.org/sid/ratt) is
really interesting but it's sometimes hard to use effectively on
personal resources: some packages have tens, if not hundreds of
reverse dependencies, and running ratt for them on your laptop is just
not feasible.
So i'm
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 03:09:07PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I want to highlight this bit.
> In the past formorer said no to this, as he doesn't want salsa to end up
> like alioth and be used for too many things. In particular, he said he
> wouldn't want anybody to rely on salsa as a user da
Hi!
There's a bunch of packages that fail to repack their sources. That is,
"dpkg-buildpackage -S" fails in a clean environment.
I've tested the entire archive, invoking:
sbuild -s --source-only-changes --no-arch-all --no-arch-any
The list below includes all packages which fail the repack bu
On 3/16/20 12:31 PM, Thomas Pircher wrote:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> I would like to suggest to replace vim-tiny with nano as the default minimal
>> editor installed with debootstrap and therefore debian-installer.
>
> Would you consider nvi as an alternative to vim-tiny? It is quite s
On 3/22/20 3:48 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:06:11AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Debian Ports is affected by this problem in particular because we don't have
>> the cruft feature in mini-DAK [3], so every time I build a debian-installer
>> image and forget c
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:06:11AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Debian Ports is affected by this problem in particular because we don't have
> the cruft feature in mini-DAK [3], so every time I build a debian-installer
> image and forget checking whether vim build successfully on every
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:59:48PM +0100, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> Long-term, we plan to authenticate these services against the salsa.debian.org
> service. Some services are part of the way there, others may take some more
> time and collaboration with upstream.
I want to highlight this bit.
In the
Hello!
Ad. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/07/msg00377.html -
fedmsg usage in Debian.
There is a note: "it seems that people actually like parsing emails"
What about adding email backend to fedmsg then. Wouldn't it be an
interesting idea? It could basically rely on postfix for sending
Hi,
Quoting Marc Haber (2020-03-22 12:20:37)
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:16:00 +0100, David Kalnischkies
> wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:50:29AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >> In the rush for cutting away small bits of minbase, it looks like we forgot
> >> a big pile of junk: /usr/share/doc
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:16:00 +0100, David Kalnischkies
wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:50:29AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> In the rush for cutting away small bits of minbase, it looks like we forgot
>> a big pile of junk: /usr/share/doc/
>
>Honestly, on space constraint systems, isn't the wh
Niels Thykier wrote:
> I think we owe ourselves to be honest and agree whether we do this or
> not. The proposed opt-in solution will almost certainly end up being a
> slow translation to saying "yes we are going to do this" - it will just
> defer the answer 5 - 10 years with a lot of extra work.
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 02:20:18 -0700, Peter Pynchon
wrote:
>I have tried LIVE Debian Plasma, Debian LXQt and Mint LMDE (Debian
>Environment) with an ASUS N53 USB Wireless adapter, and none of the Debian
>systems are able to connect to my WiFi signal. All other distros used
>(Ubuntu versions, MX Lin
I have tried LIVE Debian Plasma, Debian LXQt and Mint LMDE (Debian
Environment) with an ASUS N53 USB Wireless adapter, and none of the Debian
systems are able to connect to my WiFi signal. All other distros used
(Ubuntu versions, MX Linux, Linux Puppy, Porteus, and KDE Neon) easily
connect to my W
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Michael Biebl:
> Package: debhelper
> Version: 12.9
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion. :)
(CC'ing d-devel because I think this is relevant to the discussion there)
> some packages have a very detailed debian/changelog which goes back
> yea
20 matches
Mail list logo
