On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 2:32 PM Ansgar wrote:
> It gets confused if a source & binary package with the same name, but
> otherwise unrelated exist; or when the same binary is built from
> different sources on different architectures; or when binary and source
> versions don't match (version trackin
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" writes:
> I do think, though that we should allow the specification of *multiple*
> git repositories, with some kind of type specifier so it can be clear
> whether a particular repository is just a read-only clone versus a
> read/write "master" repository, and whether a reposit
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:40:06AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Marvin Renich writes:
>
> > The source package has historically (prior to the widespread use of VCS)
> > also provided the basis for future development. Since most development
> > these days is done using VCS, it's natural to try to
On 10/23/19 11:53 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Fully agreed. It's also hard for users to pinpoint the correct binary
> package and they tend to get stale with changes to binary names anyway
> (soname changes to libs etc.)
I think its easier for users to find the binary package name, as the
pa
Hi!
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 08:32:11 +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> the thread about naming (source) packages reminded me of an other thing:
> Debian's bug tracking system currently (mostly) tracks bugs against
> binary packages and (less often) against source packages.
> It gets confused if a source & bin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
* Package name: python3-sphinx-click
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Stephen Finucane http://that.guru/
* URL : https://github.com/click-contrib/sphinx-click
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Des
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mo Zhou
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: roc-roct-thunk-interface
Version : 2.9.0
Upstream Author : AMD
* URL :
https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCT-Thunk-Interface
* License : MIT/X11 and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sudip Mukherjee
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: tracecompass
Version : 5.1.0
* URL : https://www.eclipse.org/tracecompass/
* License : Eclipse Public License
Programming Lang: Java
Descriptio
Hi fellow developers,
As mentioned in a couple of previous mails, e.g.
"... tensorflow ...", and "... anaconda ...".
The license of software stack on nvidia's hardware
accelerator is always a problem. In the past, I helped
Debian's nvidia-team update the nvidia-cuda-toolkit
several times, and pack
On 2019-10-23, Ansgar wrote:
> So I'm wondering if we should start just filing all bug reports against
> source packages? Reportbug could probably be easily changed to use
> `Source: ...` instead of `Package: ...`; more places could follow later.
Have you ever maintained source packages where a
10 matches
Mail list logo