❦ 2 octobre 2019 05:47 +02, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL :
> An idea: establishing a time of discussion. At the end, if there is not
> consensus (as Gitlab), there is not. If there is, ensuring every DD can
> still have an opinion via GR or changes proposals in some guidelines
> (Debian Policy, etc). W
Hi,
An idea: establishing a time of discussion. At the end, if there is not
consensus (as Gitlab), there is not. If there is, ensuring every DD can
still have an opinion via GR or changes proposals in some guidelines
(Debian Policy, etc). While mails are too much and so long to be
followed by "sil
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: multiprocess
Version : 0.70.9
Upstream Author : California Institute of Technology.
* URL : https://github.com/uqfoundation/multiprocess
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: C
Descr
On 10/1/19 3:57 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> What would be more useful than this criticism is concrete advice on how
> I can shorten them while still accomplishing my goals.
after flying over your d-d-a mail again, my suggestion:
- create a blog post for each point you are discussing
- summarize
On 10/1/19 3:57 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes:
>
>
> Holger> So to me this is more the consensus of those with the
> Holger> priveledge to read, process and repond to this mailinglist,
> Holger> yet there are many more people packaging software in
On 2019-10-01 16:13:03 -0400 (-0400), Sam Hartman wrote:
> A couple of people active in Gnome have suggested discourse for
> this sort of thing. It's got enough email integration that perhaps
> we would not lose people who want that interface.
>
> I t would be interesting if someone wanted to spen
> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Carter writes:
Jonathan> I try to follow debian-devel really closely, and mostly
Jonathan> manage to succeed, but this was probably the toughest
Jonathan> topics for me to follow, there's lots of repetition,
Jonathan> me-toos, posts that don't really
Hi Sam
On 2019/10/01 15:57, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'd say it is a consensus of those who prioritize participating in this
> discussion enough to do so, consented to by the rest of the project.
> If we get it sufficiently wrong people in the broader community will let
> us know.
>
> Yes, because of
A couple of people active in Gnome have suggested discourse for this
sort of thing.
It's got enough email integration that perhaps we would not lose people
who want that interface.
I t would be interesting if someone wanted to spend the time to pilot
that.
>
> Am I really expected to add a "me too" response every time I agree with
> what
> someone else took the time to write... making it harder for people with
> limited
> time to follow? This seems especially cruel to those that don't speak
> English
> natively, and those that rely on translation ser
Say,
Our company cooperates with various logistics companies to search for the
best logistics solutions for our clients. I am very pleased to offer you the
position of Logistics Manager and place in our big and cohesive team.
I reviewed a large number of CVs provided to me by Human R
> "Michael" == Michael Lustfield writes:
Michael> On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:32:10 +
Michael> Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:57:38AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> > I'd say it is a consensus of those who prioritize participating
>> in this > discussion
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:32:10 +
Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:57:38AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > I'd say it is a consensus of those who prioritize participating in this
> > discussion enough to do so, consented to by the rest of the project.
>
> I'm sorry, but I disagr
> "Sean" == Sean Whitton writes:
Sean> You might separate your detailed, narrative descriptions of
Sean> how discussions went from what you took away from the
Sean> discussions. You could either drop the former, or put it in a
Sean> "read this if you want more details" sectio
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 02:32:10PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:57:38AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > I'd say it is a consensus of those who prioritize participating in this
> > discussion enough to do so, consented to by the rest of the project.
> I'm sorry, but I disa
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:57:38AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'd say it is a consensus of those who prioritize participating in this
> discussion enough to do so, consented to by the rest of the project.
I'm sorry, but I disagree. Silence is not always consent.
--
cheers,
Holger
---
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:21:20AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> May I ask whether you review your d-d-a e-mails, specifically with an
> eye to brevity, before sending them out? Given how many people read
> them, time invested in editing for brevity would be well spent.
that.
> You might separate
Hello Sam,
On Tue 01 Oct 2019 at 09:57AM -04, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Holger> And then, 'spreading to more places' reminds me of another
> Holger> critisism I have with your reports: they are too long. :-D
>
>
> What would be more useful than this criticism is concrete advice on how
> I can
> "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes:
Holger> So to me this is more the consensus of those with the
Holger> priveledge to read, process and repond to this mailinglist,
Holger> yet there are many more people packaging software in Debian.
I'd say it is a consensus of those who prior
Dear Sam,
first of all, many thanks for writing these 'Bits from the DPL' mails
regularily, much appreciated!
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 04:46:14PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Git Packaging
> =
[...]
> The discussion generated enough mail that I have not yet found time to
> issue a conse
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: libcpuid
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Veselin Georgiev
* URL : http://github.com/anrieff/libcpuid
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming Lang: C
Description : C library for x86/x86_
21 matches
Mail list logo
