Bug#939689: ITP: golang-github-maruel-panicparse -- Crash your app in style (Golang)

2019-09-07 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dr. Tobias Quathamer * Package name: golang-github-maruel-panicparse Version : 1.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Marc-Antoine Ruel * URL : https://github.com/maruel/panicparse * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Descr

EQUITY FUNDING

2019-09-07 Thread rowe diana
Hello Hope your business is prospering 2019 we are one of the big funding services in Singapore,We operate a project credit financing program. We finance all international business people and project owners who are interested in a business partnership and

BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP REQUEST

2019-09-07 Thread William Caldwell
TO THE MANAGING DIRECTOR/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Hello Sir/madam I want to notify you of my client's interest to invest in your company as a SILENT /ANGEL INVESTOR Please if you wish to proceed get back to me on my email as soon as possible for contact details and further proceeding Thanks

Bug#939680: ITP: golang-github-disintegration-gift -- Go Image Filtering Toolkit

2019-09-07 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dr. Tobias Quathamer * Package name: golang-github-disintegration-gift Version : 1.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Grigory Dryapak * URL : https://github.com/disintegration/gift * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Descript

Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

2019-09-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 at 07:19:30 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > I agree that it can be confusing but I think it is just as confusing as any > other doubly negated boolean expression. It usually helps me to draw the truth > table when I'm unsure. Your example of is probably not > what you meant to

Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

2019-09-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 at 06:30:34 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > «noinstcheck» would also map equally to autotools «make installcheck», > in the same way «nocheck» maps to «make check». To me, "check" would imply actively checking something - most likely by *running* the tests - rather than merely bu