Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: classmate
Version : 1.3.4
Upstream Author : Tatu Saloranta
* URL : http://github.com/FasterXML/java-classmate
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Library for
On 2019-08-07 at 16:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 07 aug 19, 09:28:12, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> I've begun to wonder whether it might be worth the overhead to set up
>> some type of mechanism to let packages which define such
>> machine-specific IDs A: declare the fact, in a central location
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:59 AM Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> 1. Delete the contents of /etc (all of it)
> 2. If a package doesn't find its "stuff" in /etc it regenerates it from
> defaults.
There is still way too much stuff that defaults to installing
important files in /etc (default config settings, i
On Mi, 07 aug 19, 09:28:12, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> I've begun to wonder whether it might be worth the overhead to set up
> some type of mechanism to let packages which define such
> machine-specific IDs A: declare the fact, in a central location which
Do you mean /etc? :)
> the sysadmin of a ma
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
On Mi, 07 aug 19, 22:11:42, Sakirnth Nagarasa wrote:
> Package: nghttp3
> Owner: sakir...@gmail.com
>
> * Package name: nghttp3
> Upstream Author : nghttp3 contributors
> * License : MIT License
> Description : Implementation of HTTP/3 mapping over QU
On 07.08.19 19:00, Marc Haber wrote:
> Marc, who is trying to have neutral view on systemd and has managed to
> be seen as a fanboi by systemd haters and as a hater by the systemd
> community, and now fully expects the CoC to be used to be silenced
Marc, i don't hope so - you are not alone. Fo
On 2019-08-07 18:51, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2019-08-07 10:19:00 +0200 (+0200), Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, 05 Aug 2019 22:29:41 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
[...]
> I'd still expect a Cloud/Compute provider to offer default
> images in any case that could be preconfigured appropriately.
I am on
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:00:36PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:44:01 +0100, Ian Jackson
> wrote:
> >Marc Haber writes ("Re: do packages depend on lexical order or
> >{daily,weekly,monthly} cron jobs?"):
> >> We have already thrown sysvinit away.
> >
> >No, we have not.
>
> W
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:44:01 +0100, Ian Jackson
wrote:
>Marc Haber writes ("Re: do packages depend on lexical order or
>{daily,weekly,monthly} cron jobs?"):
>> We have already thrown sysvinit away.
>
>No, we have not.
We have given up on so many ideas that sysvinit has come with that it
doesn't m
On 2019-08-07 10:19:00 +0200 (+0200), Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Aug 2019 22:29:41 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
[...]
> > I'd still expect a Cloud/Compute provider to offer default
> > images in any case that could be preconfigured appropriately.
>
> I am one of those customers who almost never
The Wanderer writes:
> This isn't the first time I've discovered that some aspect of a Debian
> system would actually need to be cleared and re-generated when that
> system is cloned, well after the point where it would have been easy for
> me to address that need. (Fortunately, although I've mov
Michael Stone writes:
> I don't think popcon is a good reason to pause if there are valid
> concerns suggesting removal is a good thing, for the exact reason that
> it's skewed to propagating existing practice. I'm not sure there's any
> really good use for popcon, but I'll continue to believe th
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 04:02:14PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Michael Stone writes ("Re: duplicate popularity-contest ID"):
I guess the question is what is the point of the popcon statistics.
Insofar as they're used to determine defaults, skewing them toward
custom images (which likely do not car
* The Wanderer [190807 09:28]:
> Cloning isn't the only example of a case where some machine-specific
> configuration detail may need to be updated, without that being obvious
> in advance.
>
> I've begun to wonder whether it might be worth the overhead to set up
> some type of mechanism to let p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
* Package name: ocaml-integers
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Jeremy Yallop and others
* URL : https://github.com/ocamllabs/ocaml-integers
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : V
Michael Stone writes ("Re: duplicate popularity-contest ID"):
> I guess the question is what is the point of the popcon statistics.
> Insofar as they're used to determine defaults, skewing them toward
> custom images (which likely do not care about defaults) is probably a
> mistake.
popcon is a
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes ("Re: Bits from the Release Team:
ride like the wind, Bullseye!"):
> No, what I have been perceiving (and pretty please note that this is my
> personal "feeling") is that maintainers, specially library maintainers, have
> even more and more "stuff to care
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
* Package name: ocaml-stdio
Version : 0.12.0
Upstream Author : Jane Street Group, LLC
* URL : https://github.com/janestreet/stdio
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : Standard IO
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 09:31:34AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 11:33:42 +, Bill Allombert
wrote:
Yesterday I received the same popcon ID 2600 times, and 4700 differents ID were
received
two times and 22000 ID were received exactly once.
I understand the need for totally id
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
* Package name: janest-base
Version : 0.12.2
Upstream Author : Jane Street Group, LLC
* URL : https://github.com/janestreet/base
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : Full standard
Hi Mark,
Thanks for notifying me of this discussion at
https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/issues/47
I have been trough some issues recently (apt-cacher-ng that spew
errors after the release)
and I had to dig trough the cron-daily unit journal to locate the problem
and I untersand this i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
* Package name: ocaml-sexplib0
Version : 0.12.0
Upstream Author : Jane Street Group, LLC
* URL : https://github.com/janestreet/sexplib0
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : Librar
Marc Haber writes ("Re: do packages depend on lexical order or
{daily,weekly,monthly} cron jobs?"):
> We have already thrown sysvinit away.
No, we have not.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sysvinit
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=sysvinit#_2_4_5
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/in
On 2019-08-07 at 04:26, Russell Stuart wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 09:34 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>
>> I am using Debian for two decades now, and I realized that
>> necessity two days ago.
>
> Ditto - except for me it was a few seconds ago.
In my case, it was when I read this thread last nig
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: do packages depend on lexical order or
{daily,weekly,monthly} cron jobs?"):
> Trying to make this point more clearly because you seem to be confusing
> systemd with systemd-cron:
You are completely right. I was not aware that systemd-cron was not
part of systemd.
> s
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 09:34 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> I am using Debian for two decades now, and I realized that necessity
> two days ago.
Ditto - except for me it was a few seconds ago.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 05 Aug 2019 22:29:41 +0200, Philipp Kern
wrote:
>With a systemd timer you can declare conflicts as well as a
>lineralization if so needed.
How would that be configured? Should all timers generated from
cron.fooly be grouped together (in a target?) and conflict with that
very target?
>I
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 16:34:18 +0100, Ian Jackson
wrote:
>So it seems to me that there are the following options for systemd
>users:
>
>A. Continue to use run-parts.
>
> Disadvantages: Bundles the output together.
> Doesn't provide individual status.
>
> Advantages: No work needed.
>
>B. Run ea
On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 14:01:16 -0400, Sam Hartman
wrote:
>> "Bill" == Bill Allombert writes:
>
>Bill> This is potentially an excellent idea!
>
>Bill> Does not /etc/machine-id suffer of exactly the same issue as
>Bill> /etc/popularity-contest.conf ?
>
>A lot more procedures for cloni
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 11:33:42 +, Bill Allombert
wrote:
>Yesterday I received the same popcon ID 2600 times, and 4700 differents ID
>were received
>two times and 22000 ID were received exactly once.
>
>I understand the need for totally identical systems, but then probably
>it does not make sense
30 matches
Mail list logo
