Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Fri 05 Jul 2019 at 08:37AM +08, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:53 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > >> Does every DD have (i) access (ii) social authority, to make changes >> to the upstream repo, the same way we do for the Debian package ? > > I was simply talking about standard

Re: Please help me to create Debian package

2019-07-04 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2019, ജൂലൈ 4 8:50:25 PM IST, himanshu Singh wrote: >Hi, I am working on a project named Osdag. It is open-source software >for >the design of steel structures. I'm trying to create a Debian package >for >it and planning to add to Debian package repository. It would be a >great >help if someo

Work-needing packages report for Jul 5, 2019

2019-07-04 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 1438 (new: 8) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 156 (new: 1) Total number of packages reques

Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:53 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Does every DD have (i) access (ii) social authority, to make changes > to the upstream repo, the same way we do for the Debian package ? I was simply talking about standard upstream contribution mechanisms; pull requests, requests to pull fr

Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Daniel Reurich
On 05/07/19 09:02, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 05 Jul 2019 at 01:07:59 +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote: >> Our packaging approach is more or less "unapplied" for 3.0(quilt) >> packages, and (I think) pretty much universally using quilt and gbp - >> only for changelog and buildpackage (because it do

Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 05 Jul 2019 at 01:07:59 +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote: > Our packaging approach is more or less "unapplied" for 3.0(quilt) > packages, and (I think) pretty much universally using quilt and gbp - > only for changelog and buildpackage (because it does a nice pbuilder > based build process with

Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Daniel" == Daniel Reurich writes: Daniel> As a lurker and pervasive packager of the downstream Devuan, Daniel> I thought I'd share some of my thoughts on this as git has Daniel> been the core of our work flow and build system. Thanks for joining the discussion!/ Daniel> F

Re: Please help me to create Debian package

2019-07-04 Thread olivier sallou
Le jeu. 4 juil. 2019 à 18:31, Mindaugas Celiesius a écrit : > > > > Hi, I am working on a project named Osdag. It is open-source software > for the design of steel structures. I'm trying to create a Debian package > for it and planning to add to Debian package repository. It would be a > great he

Re: Please help me to create Debian package

2019-07-04 Thread Mindaugas Celiesius
> Hi, I am working on a project named Osdag. It is open-source software for the > design of steel structures. I'm trying to create a Debian package for it and > planning to add to Debian package repository. It would be a great help if > someone could create a package for us or help us to crea

Please help me to create Debian package

2019-07-04 Thread himanshu Singh
Hi, I am working on a project named Osdag. It is open-source software for the design of steel structures. I'm trying to create a Debian package for it and planning to add to Debian package repository. It would be a great help if someone could create a package for us or help us to create that. The s

Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Daniel Reurich
On 30/06/19 00:16, Ian Jackson wrote: > Enrico Zini writes ("Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository > format"): >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:42:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> I hope you all won't mind too much that Sean and I have privileged our >>> own point of view, in the

Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Wise writes ("Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format"): > On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 12:19 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > What should another Debian contributor do, who wants to make a change > > to the upstream source, but wants to do so in your own git workflow > > and co

Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 12:19 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > What should another Debian contributor do, who wants to make a change > to the upstream source, but wants to do so in your own git workflow > and collaborate via your git branch, rather than by uploading a .dsc ? Do upstream changes upstream

Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Wise writes ("Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format"): > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 11:37 AM Russ Allbery wrote: > > > I don't recognise the repository structure that was raised by myself and > > > some others: A VCS repository that contains only the Debian packaging > >

Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Thu 04 Jul 2019 at 01:21pm +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Ian Jackson writes: > >> Please let us know if we have missed one. It is probably better if >> you ask us rather than just adding it, unless you're sure that what >> you are adding isn't the same as one of the existing ones. In >>

Re: Survey results: git packaging practices / repository format

2019-07-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:52:46PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I suspect Ian is assuming that some amount of that is always necessary > when saying that "tools like Quilt" are required. I have to admit that > I'm quite impressed that you *never* have any reason to need to do this > when packaging