Adam Borowski wrote:
> Thus, what would you guys say about a new distribution, "scratch"? It would
> be a kind of extra-experimental that doesn't put its build results anywhere
> persistent. Throwing away built .debs would be ok, keeping just logs.
Perhaps I'm missing something but would introd
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:51:56PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Hi!
> Fedora has an awesome feature for packagers: scratch builds. It would be
> great if we could steal the idea.
>
> I find myself doing incremental uploads just to fix bugs that the previous
> upload revealed on some weird arch.
Am 14.06.19 um 22:51 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> Hi!
> Fedora has an awesome feature for packagers: scratch builds. It would be
> great if we could steal the idea.
>
> I find myself doing incremental uploads just to fix bugs that the previous
> upload revealed on some weird arch. At home, I can rea
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 12:56:53PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Most debian systems are not installed with d-i. When you include things
> like FAI for installing sites and clusters; chroots, containers, VMs,
> etc, d-i is not used in most situations.
Your 'most' does not match mine.
I played with
Hi!
Fedora has an awesome feature for packagers: scratch builds. It would be
great if we could steal the idea.
I find myself doing incremental uploads just to fix bugs that the previous
upload revealed on some weird arch. At home, I can reasonably test only
amd64 and arm64 -- especially if valgr
5 matches
Mail list logo
