Quoting Helmut Grohne (2019-05-31 07:17:07)
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:46:48AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 10:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Use the $300,000 on our bank accounts?
> >
> > I heard that this didn't work out well the last time ("dunc tank"),
> > though t
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:46:48AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 10:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Use the $300,000 on our bank accounts?
>
> I heard that this didn't work out well the last time ("dunc tank"),
> though that was before the time I followed Debian development.
I
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1422 (new: 14)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 159 (new: 3)
Total number of packages reque
Ckghfwssm Ckghfwssm,
I am Ashlie Bennett. I am an HR. Our company is recruiting a sociable,
punctual, responsible person to join our team as online manager. After
examining a list of resumes, we chose you as the most eligible candidate.
We offer this job as underemployment at the moment. We w
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:01:44AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Use the $300,000 on our bank accounts?
> > I heard that this didn't work out well the last time ("dunc tank"),
> > though that was before the time I followed Debian development.
> Yes, I was there (and mention it briefly in the
On 2019-05-29 7:39 p.m., Raphaël Halimi wrote:
> Le 29/05/2019 à 15:41, Ondřej Surý a écrit :
>> can’t you just “skip” building the module in DKMS when on unsupported
>> architecture?
>>
>> Install the package on that system would be noop then.
>
> Well, I was so focused on trying to make the pac
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 11:14:33PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> ...
> > Often the most difficult part of packaging are the unique rules the
> > Debian ftp team requires for debian/copyright that are not required in
> > distributions with actual lawyers. That's a completely
Le 30/05/2019 à 19:28, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
>> Well, that's what I thought to do at the beginning, but the docs say
>> that binary package duplication is a bad thing, and I didn't know if
>> four copies of a 13 KB package (so a waste of 49 KB per mirror, which
>> would seem negligible unless you'r
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 01:14:10PM +0200, Raphaël Halimi wrote:
>...
> Well, that's what I thought to do at the beginning, but the docs say
> that binary package duplication is a bad thing, and I didn't know if
> four copies of a 13 KB package (so a waste of 49 KB per mirror, which
> would seem neg
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 01:14:10PM +0200, Raphaël Halimi wrote:
> Well, that's what I thought to do at the beginning, but the docs say
> that binary package duplication is a bad thing, and I didn't know if
> four copies of a 13 KB package (so a waste of 49 KB per mirror, which
> would seem negligib
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 929263 /sbin and /usr/sbin are not in $PATH for unpriviledged users
Bug #929263 [general] /sbin and /usr/sbin are not in
/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/snap/bin:/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:~/bin:~/Projects/
Le 30/05/2019 à 04:14, Paul Wise a écrit :
> dak needs a way to restrict the availability of arch:all packages to
> certain architecture's Packages files. This would also be useful for
> interpreted code that only has support for certain kernel interfaces
> that aren't available on non-Linux kernel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 929263 /sbin and /usr/sbin are not in
> /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/snap/bin:/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:~/bin:~/Projects/bin:/usr/local/go/bin:/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:/home/manu/bin:/home/manu/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 929263 general
Bug #929263 [cloud.debian.org] cloud.debian.org: /usr/sbin not in default $PATH
Bug reassigned from package 'cloud.debian.org' to 'general'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #929263 to the same values
previo
]] Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
> Forwarding mail from @debian.org to my mailbox makes me apply
> complicated filters to stay subscribed to ML I wish.
In that case, I suggest you don't subscribe with your debian.org email
address.
> Do you confirm me it is really not wanted to pull mails from a Debian
15 matches
Mail list logo
