❦ 28 mai 2019 06:30 +00, Niels Thykier :
> I.e. with the proper implementation of "make-it-work" (in the lack of a
> better name - maybe something "fetch-and-build"), the following should
> be possible
>
> """
> #!/usr/bin/make -f
>
> # DISTRIBUTION = $(shell sed -n "s/^VERSION_CODENAME=//p" /etc
Vincent Bernat:
> ❦ 28 mai 2019 08:59 +08, Paul Wise :
>
>>> People using tools like fpm will never get familiar with our tools and
>>> will never be contributors.
>>
>> I enjoyed your blog post about pragmatic packaging using Debian's
>> tools instead of fpm, it seems like a good approach if one
Le 28/05/2019 à 07:53, Jonathan Carter a écrit :
> On 2019/05/28 01:05, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
>> I am happy with being now a non-uploading DD. And I dont know where to
>> ask, sorry for the noise.
>>
>> For non-uploading DD, is a salsa account created? I tried to auth with
>> it, but not p
Hello.
My name is Thomas Dettbarn, and following a suggestion on
debian-upstream@, I would like to advertise an RFP/RFA I reported to the
bugtracker:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929619
Hopefully this increases its visibility. :)
This package, which I would very much
On 2019/05/28 01:05, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> I am happy with being now a non-uploading DD. And I dont know where to
> ask, sorry for the noise.
>
> For non-uploading DD, is a salsa account created? I tried to auth with
> it, but not possible, then to reset the passwd, but I dont rceive mail
❦ 28 mai 2019 08:59 +08, Paul Wise :
>> People using tools like fpm will never get familiar with our tools and
>> will never be contributors.
>
> I enjoyed your blog post about pragmatic packaging using Debian's
> tools instead of fpm, it seems like a good approach if one is
> committed to using
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 2:52 PM Vincent Bernat wrote:
> People using tools like fpm will never get familiar with our tools and
> will never be contributors.
I enjoyed your blog post about pragmatic packaging using Debian's
tools instead of fpm, it seems like a good approach if one is
committed to
Hi,
I am happy with being now a non-uploading DD. And I dont know where to
ask, sorry for the noise.
For non-uploading DD, is a salsa account created? I tried to auth with
it, but not possible, then to reset the passwd, but I dont rceive mail
to do it on @debian.org.
Thanks for your help
Regard
Jonas Meurer writes:
> Depending on the software you packages, doing the initial packaging
> already requires a lot of knowledge about library handling, doc build
> systems, makefiles, the filesystem hierarchy standard, language-specific
> toolchains, etc.
> To properly build the package you hav
On May 27, 2019 11:50:38 AM UTC, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Scott" == Scott Kitterman writes:
>Scott> If we want to make not using dh except in certain situations
>Scott> a bug, it seems like something for a policy should kind of
>Scott> item. We have an existing process for updat
On 2019-05-27.12:27, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't have *links* either, but when introducing people
> into the world of Debian packaging recently, I always got the impression
> that they were heavily overwhelmed by the complexity of the Debian
> ecosystem.
As a recently promoted DM,
Hi Sam,
Sam Hartman:
>> "Jonas" == Jonas Meurer writes:
> Jonas> My opinion is that more uniformity in packaging practices
> Jonas> will bring a bit more simplicity as well. Therefore I applaud
> Jonas> Sam's initiative to require DH whereever it's sensible.
>
> Hi.
> I'm acting
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: python-django-storages
Version : 1.7.1
Upstream Author : Josh Schneier
* URL : https://github.com/jschneier/django-storages/
* License :
> "Jonas" == Jonas Meurer writes:
Jonas> My opinion is that more uniformity in packaging practices
Jonas> will bring a bit more simplicity as well. Therefore I applaud
Jonas> Sam's initiative to require DH whereever it's sensible.
Hi.
I'm acting as a facilitator here not as a pr
> "Ben" == Ben Finney writes:
Ben> Sam Hartman writes:
>> If you just want to get upstream's idea of their package onto a
>> system with their release schedule and their recommended
>> dependency versions, there are better ways than getting a package
>> into Debian.
On 5/27/19 6:29 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 07:28:55PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>>> We "uphold this reputation" by maintaining many packages, which is
>>> good.
>>
>> Do we? I am now using nix to get packages for stuff not in Debian. Our
>> package count is artificiall
> "Scott" == Scott Kitterman writes:
Scott> If we want to make not using dh except in certain situations
Scott> a bug, it seems like something for a policy should kind of
Scott> item. We have an existing process for updating policy, so
Scott> this should probably be kicked ove
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> This is my experience as well. I've occasionally tried to get
Russ> people at work (at various jobs) interested in packaging
Russ> software for Debian, without all that much success. The
Russ> problem seems less any one specific thing a
Adrian Bunk:
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 11:34:39AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>> ...
>> We have a reputation of having difficult
>> packaging practices. We uphold this reputation as long as we have so
>> many ways to do the same thing.
>
> [citation needed]
>
> I do honestly not know what stat
19 matches
Mail list logo
