On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 04:55:12PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > biococoa (U) does not use Debhelper (no compat level found)
> > (source version: 2.2.2-4)
> > biococoa (U) should switch to dh. Current build
Hi,
On 15.04.19 21:23, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Generating an upstream tarball in this case is still useful because this
> way we do not need to upload and store forever the full source archive
> every time that something changes only in the packaging.
That, and upstream tarballs generated with "g
On Apr 15, Sam Hartman wrote:
> However if my sources are in git, git is the definitive format for
> thinking about things, and the dsc I'm producing is only for the
> convenience of the archive, I don't want to deal with an upstream
> tarball.
Generating an upstream tarball in this case is still
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: jadx
Version: 0.9.0
Upstream Author: Skylot
URL: https://github.com/skylot/jadx
License: Apache-2.0
Description: Android Dex decompiler
Jadx is a decompiler for Android Dex
> "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes:
Holger> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 01:48:01PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 10:04:10 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> > I see no point whatsoever in 3.0 (native). The main advantage
>> of 3.0 (native) is that it makes it
On 15/04/19 at 16:55 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Are you sure that you are not tricked by false positives from lintian?
I might be, but if lintian reports something incorrectly about your
package, it's probably worth fixing in lintian.
Lucas
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 04:55:12PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> biococoa (U) does not use Debhelper (no compat level found)
> (source version: 2.2.2-4)
> biococoa (U) should switch to dh. Current build system: cdbs
> (source version: 2.2.2-4)
| % grep cdbs -r biococoa-2.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 03:46:57PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 10:20:53 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > TL;DR: see https://trends.debian.net and
> > https://trends.debian.net/#smells
>
> Very nice, thank you.
+1
I like it a lot!
> > [4] https://trends.debian.net/smell
On 4/14/19 1:00 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Or how about removing Python2 altogether, then?
That's actually not a bad idea, which we considered, and only postponed
until Buster is out. FYI, I already started removing Python 2 support in
many of the packages I maintain (currently only uploaded to Exp
On 4/15/19 9:24 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 21:11:09 +0200
> "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" wrote:
>> I think it's the right decision of the release team to stick with golang
>> 1.11 for buster. The previous migration from golang 1.10 to 1.11 took us
>> about four weeks until we had fix
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 21:11:09 +0200
"Dr. Tobias Quathamer" wrote:
> I think it's the right decision of the release team to stick with golang
> 1.11 for buster. The previous migration from golang 1.10 to 1.11 took us
> about four weeks until we had fixed all packages with new FTBFS bugs.
Can we mi
11 matches
Mail list logo
