Bug#918448: ITP: jitterdebugger -- Real time response measurement tool

2019-01-05 Thread 林上智
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: SZ Lin (林上智) X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: jitterdebugger Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Daniel Wagner * URL : https://github.com/igaw/jitterdebugger * License : Expat Programming Lang: C

Bug#793404: massive waste of CPU time in debian/rules by inline commands

2019-01-05 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi Niels, Thanks for your explanation :) On Sat, 05 Jan 2019 09:52:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: > We are very far from being able to flip the default. There are some > 800+ packages that need to be updated to follow latest policy > requirements plus explicitly declare their need for (fake)roo

Re: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS vs DEB_BUILD_PROFILES: What is right and what is wrong?

2019-01-05 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Johannes, thanks for the quick response. Johannes Schauer wrote: > > A) lintian by mixing up build tags and build profiles? (Maybe this > >mentioning of build profiles was overseen when fixing #889746.) > > I assume this to be the case. Would be happy to hear, if Mattia sees this the sam

Re: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS vs DEB_BUILD_PROFILES: What is right and what is wrong?

2019-01-05 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Axel Beckert (2019-01-06 01:39:09) > while trying to get the nocheck build profile working, I stumbled over > some discrepancies between > > * Debian Policy §4.9.1, > * dpkg-buildflags (behaviour + man page), and > * lintian's long description of the tag > override_dh_auto_test-does

Partnership proposal

2019-01-05 Thread JOHN LEWIS PLC
-- Hi, Located in the united kingdom, the famous brand John Lewis PLC, is UK's largest multi-channel retailer with over 45 shops furnished by European products. We are looking for new products to attract new customers and also retain our existing ones, create new partnerships with companies

DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS vs DEB_BUILD_PROFILES: What is right and what is wrong?

2019-01-05 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, while trying to get the nocheck build profile working, I stumbled over some discrepancies between * Debian Policy §4.9.1, * dpkg-buildflags (behaviour + man page), and * lintian's long description of the tag override_dh_auto_test-does-not-check-DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. lintian recommends, e.g. a

Re: deduplicating jquery/

2019-01-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sean Whitton, le sam. 05 janv. 2019 19:48:35 +, a ecrit: > Forgive my ignorance of the specifics of this package, but why can't you > add symlinks to the files shipped by libjs-jquery? That is the standard > solution. openjdk's javadoc not only includes libjs-query, but also jszip, jszip-util

Re: deduplicating jquery/

2019-01-05 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Samuel, On Fri 04 Jan 2019 at 08:16pm +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Quite a few packages have jquery/ embedded in documentation generated by > javadoc. This yields to > > « > libfoo-java shares 1.2 MB of similar files with package > liblizzie-java-doc, please investigate whether it is pos

Bug#793404: massive waste of CPU time in debian/rules by inline commands

2019-01-05 Thread Niels Thykier
Hideki Yamane: > Hi, > > On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 11:11:00 + > Niels Thykier wrote: >> * Migrating to "Rules-Requires-Root: no" where possible. > > Is there any plan to set "Rules-Requires-Root: no" for default? > It seems that most of the packages doesn't require root privilege > to be built

Bug#793404: massive waste of CPU time in debian/rules by inline commands

2019-01-05 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 11:11:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: > * Migrating to "Rules-Requires-Root: no" where possible. Is there any plan to set "Rules-Requires-Root: no" for default? It seems that most of the packages doesn't require root privilege to be built, so "default no" is better to r