Carsten Leonhardt writes:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>> The general principle that I would advocate for here, though, is that
>> if someone says clearly and explicitly "never contact me again," we
>> should do what we can to never contact them again.
> If the message would be signed I'd agree, but
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 07:50:55PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Then, they should click on the button they are asked to click. This
> takes far less time than a long (and discourteous) rant.
Yeah... you walk out without a word, and are upset if people still care
about you? MW acted like an ass
Dear Mattia,
> My reply indeed had quite a grumpy tone, and I realized only after
> sending it, of course. I need to get into the habit of asking somebody
> else to review my emails when they treat such matters.
Thank you for not only pausing for this self-reflection but for
subsequently sharing
> I don't think that you can claim that the act of sending a mail to a
> list @lists.debian.org can constitute an implied agreement to accept and
> abide by the code of conduct. That is no different than "by reading
> this, you are bound by these terms." No reasonable person would
> consider eith
❦ 11 novembre 2018 19:20 +0100, Wouter Verhelst :
> Meanwhile, it makes sense to be courteous to people who were a DD once
> but really couldn't care less now and want to get rid of the nagging,
> which seems like a far more likely scenario.
Then, they should click on the button they are asked t
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:30:23AM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> On October 31, 2018 3:59:42 AM UTC, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 09:34:59PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >>...
> >> 1. Most licenses require copyright statements to be included. In the
> >FTP
> >> te
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 06:31:35PM +0100, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>
> > The general principle that I would advocate for here, though, is that if
> > someone says clearly and explicitly "never contact me again," we should do
> > what we can to never contact them again.
>
>
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 03:38:32PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> > > he agreed with the CoC,
> >
> > He did not, the CoC didn't exist yet 14 years ago.
>
> He did, if not before, when he sent his mail to a mailing list
> @lists.debian.org.
>
> He might not have realised that, of course.
>
I do
Russ Allbery writes:
> The general principle that I would advocate for here, though, is that if
> someone says clearly and explicitly "never contact me again," we should do
> what we can to never contact them again.
If the message would be signed I'd agree, but for a non-signed message
that woul
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 10:36:53AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> But why the new debian/changelog? It is a honest question.
Seems perfectly reasonable to me (and indeed I'd have thought it was
best practice): make a change, add a changelog entry to go with it. If
the maintainer wants to do somet
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: x2godesktopsharing
Version : 3.1.1.4
Upstream Author : X2Go Developers
* URL :
https://wiki.x2go.org/doku.php/doc:usage:desktop-sharing?s[]=x2godesktopsharing
* License : GPL-2+
Programmin
> > he agreed with the CoC,
>
> He did not, the CoC didn't exist yet 14 years ago.
He did, if not before, when he sent his mail to a mailing list
@lists.debian.org.
He might not have realised that, of course.
-nik
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 01:51:56PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 04:57:51PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > That's what Vcs-Git et al are for, isn't it?
>
> I'm sorry I don't understand what you're saying.
That was in response to the visibility aspect of your email. I
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 04:57:51PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
That's what Vcs-Git et al are for, isn't it?
I'm sorry I don't understand what you're saying.
Right now, the only way that someone can indicate that a package is
collaboratively maintained via the control file is to have their Vcs
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 15:43:41 + (UTC), Felipe Sateler
wrote:
>But for example, about a month ago Ond?ej Nový
>changed the Format: url of d/copyright to use https on one of my packages
>(and I assume a lot more), and didn't notify me. I don't think it is
>reasonable to ask for coordination for
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 03:49:32PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> I am thus very happy that this DD is leaving immediately - whether you see
> this as bureaucracy or not, he agreed with rules and processes when he
> joined,
There were *far* fewer of them when he did. In 2000, you didn't need an
ad
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 07:07:36PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo writes:
>
> > Indeed, I was very bothered.
>
> > On the other hand, most of my reply to willy's mail was not addressed to
> > him, but to debian-devel@ at large, to have everybody else understand
> > how silly what he
On 10/11/2018 17:18, Phil Morrell wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 10:36:53AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
On 09/11/2018 20:26, Colin Watson wrote:
I guessed that the particular commit was
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pcre2/commit/6c14b51ddfc45604fd805bcadc810d437f09a30f.
(The same developer h
Dear Jonathan,
> >Debian's Dictionary is in a weird order; "Thank You" is right next to
> >the definition of "Entitlement"
>
> Sorry this wasn't a helpful message.
(I'm a little behind on this thread alas but I just wanted to thank
you for following up with this retraction.)
Best wishes,
--
19 matches
Mail list logo