Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yao Wei (魏銘廷)
* Package name: python-backports.os
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Pi Delport
* URL : https://github.com/pjdelport/backports.os/
* License : PSF-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Backports
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: aiowsgi
Version : 0.0.7
Upstream Author : Gael Pasgrimaud
* URL : https://github.com/gawel/aiowsgi
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : minimalist WSGI server impl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: wsgiproxy2
Version : 0.4.5
Upstream Author : Gael Pasgrimaud
* URL : https://github.com/gawel/WSGIProxy2/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A WSGI Proxy with va
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 12:45:17PM +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> > I disagree, in both cases.
> >
> > Debian should not pay anything through an organization that has race, gender
> > and nationality discrimination as its core purpose. Accepting code produced
> > this way is acceptable (as would b
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 10:22:58PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 at 12:20:55 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > please work with packages
> > that depend on libpam-systemd to add appropriate alternatives like
> > libpam-systemd | libpam-elogind if and *only* if they work with both
On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 at 12:20:55 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> please work with packages
> that depend on libpam-systemd to add appropriate alternatives like
> libpam-systemd | libpam-elogind if and *only* if they work with both.
Yes, this. libpam-elogind is very unlikely to be enough to satisfy
db
Adam Borowski writes:
> Conflicts would greatly simplify packaging, but I'm afraid we need
> coinstallability at least for upgrades. With d-i installing systemd,
> the user needs to be able to switch to sysvinit -- and, horrors, some
> might want to go the other way.
> It'd be damage to allow t
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 03:39:10PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 05:41:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Should it also Conflict libpam-systemd ?
>
> Does it somehow prevent the admin from configuring one or the other in pam?
Conflicts would greatly simplify packaging, bu
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 05:41:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> tl/dr: would this be wrong
>Package: libpam-elogind
>Provides: libpam-systemd
> and should there be a Conflicts too ?
This has been briefly discussed before: it's a quite bad idea to have
provides with same name as a real packa
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 05:41:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Should it also Conflict libpam-systemd ?
Does it somehow prevent the admin from configuring one or the other in
pam?
(Our draft package ships libpam_elogind.so, but there are some
difficulties with pam configuration ending up refe
Ian Jackson wrote:
> tl/dr: would this be wrong
>Package: libpam-elogind
>Provides: libpam-systemd
> and should there be a Conflicts too ?
Please don't, no, for multiple reasons.
First, various packages followed the widely offered advice of using
libpam-systemd as the correct package to d
Le 02/11/2018 à 15:07, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 28/10/2018 à 23:06, Xavier a écrit :
>> Le 28/10/2018 à 19:38, Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit :
>>> Hi Xavier,
>>>
>>> thanks for doing this, it looks awesome :).
>>
>> Thanks ;-)
>>
>>> Would it make sense to split this into a Gitlab part and a Salsa only
>
Hi.
tl/dr: would this be wrong
Package: libpam-elogind
Provides: libpam-systemd
and should there be a Conflicts too ?
(emailing the systemd maintainers since that's Providing their package
name, and also d-devel since I'm not sure what input others may have)
There's an active effort now
Le 28/10/2018 à 23:06, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 28/10/2018 à 19:38, Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit :
>> Hi Xavier,
>>
>> thanks for doing this, it looks awesome :).
>
> Thanks ;-)
>
>> Would it make sense to split this into a Gitlab part and a Salsa only
>> part? There are already a number of Gitlab too
I have exactly the same problem.
If I can do some test let me know.
Kernel: 4.18.0-1-rt-amd64
Debian Release: buster/sid
--
---
Pozdrawiam
Adam Nieścierowicz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:47AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 09:41:43AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 01:02:57PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> > wrote:
> > > I meant that we would say that stable is supported by the security team.
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 10:15, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:18 AM Holger Levsen wrote:
> >
> > > ... and that's what I meant when I said not much has changed: what was
> > > bad about about the idea of Debian paying
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:58:47AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 09:41:43AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 01:02:57PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> > wrote:
> > > I meant that we would say that stable is supported by the security team.
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:18 AM Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> > ... and that's what I meant when I said not much has changed: what was
> > bad about about the idea of Debian paying people I still think is bad
> > today. And I don't think I'm a
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 09:41:43AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 01:02:57PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
I meant that we would say that stable is supported by the security team.
And instead of saying that Jessie was supported by the LTS team, we
would say s
20 matches
Mail list logo
