Bug#910487: ITP: r-cran-eaf -- GNU R plots of the empirical attainment function

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-eaf Version : 1.8 Upstream Author : Manuel López-Ibáñez * URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=eaf * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: GNU R Description : GNU R plots of t

Bug#910484: ITP: python-backports.csv -- Backport of the Python 3 CSV module for Python 2

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stuart Prescott * Package name: python-backports.csv Version : 1.0.6 Upstream Author : Python Software Foundation * URL : https://github.com/ryanhiebert/backports.csv * License : Python Software Foundation License v 2 P

Re: Solomonic Ruling applied to namespaces (was Re: Updating the policy for conflicting binaries names ?)

Guillem Jover writes: > then suddenly there's no one to claim it, and it can be > taken by a third party. Can you name any cases where that has happened? I was under the impression that the intent was that a disputed name would be deemed unavailable to all after such a ruling. Cheers, Phil. --

Bug#910461: ITP: r-cran-paramhelpers -- GNU R helpers for parameters in black-box optimization and tuning

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-paramhelpers Version : 1.11 Upstream Author : Bernd Bischl, * URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=ParamHelpers * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: GNU R Description

Bug#910460: ITP: r-cran-parallelmap -- GNU R unified interface to parallelization back-ends

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: r-cran-parallelmap Version : 1.3 Upstream Author : Bernd Bischl , Michel Lang * URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=parallelMap * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: GNU R Descr

Solomonic Ruling applied to namespaces (was Re: Updating the policy for conflicting binaries names ?)

Hi! On Sun, 2018-09-09 at 21:32:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I am in favour of my "cut the child in half" rule, as a general rule. While the intention there was good and it might apparently feel like a good deterrent, I think the Solomonic Ruling is actually a very bad fit for something like a

Re: Updating an uploaded package

On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 11:00:37AM +0300, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote: > If I need to update a package uploaded to mentors can I just upload the new > package with dput? Yes. You can even reuse the version. Also, the proper mailing list for such questions is debian-mentors@ -- WBR, wRAR signature.a

Updating an uploaded package

Hi If I need to update a package uploaded to mentors can I just upload the new package with dput? - Tommi Höynälänmaa