Forwarded Message
From: Molly de Blanc
To: debian-wo...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Outreachy December - March round!
It's that time of the year again: Outreachy December - March
application round!
Outreachy is a project that provides three-month internships for people
underr
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1299 (new: 2)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 168 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:49:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > So is it appropriate to bump an epoch in Debian to match an important
> > downstream's epoch?
> Yes. Precisely because there is collaboration between both sides on those
> packages.
[..]
I a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jochen Sprickerhof
* Package name: eclipse-platform-team
Version : 4.7.3
Upstream Author : Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
* URL : https://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/platform-team/
* License : EPL-1.0
Programming Lang: Java
Des
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 8:50 PM eamanu15 wrote:
> I think that you have to package it or search a contributor/mantainer to
> package it.
The canonical guide for new package maintainers is here:
https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Hi Tommi,
I think that you have to package it or search a contributor/mantainer to
package it.
Regards!
El jue., 27 de sep. de 2018 a la(s) 09:30, Tommi Höynälänmaa (
tommi.hoynalan...@gmail.com) escribió:
> Hi
>
> I would like to include the following software to Debian testing or
> stable di
Hi
I would like to include the following software to Debian testing or
stable distribution:
- Theme-D programming language
- Theme-D-Gnome library
See pages
http://www.iki.fi/tohoyn/theme-d/
http://www.iki.fi/tohoyn/theme-d/theme-d-gnome.html
What should I do?
- Tommi Höynälänma
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:41:02PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> I appreciate your thinking of possible solutions, but my understanding
> is that Canonical isn't investing in any more Launchpad work than is
> necessary.
This overstates the case a bit. It's true that we don't have a large
number of
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 09:32:31AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:48 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > So is it appropriate to bump an epoch in Debian to match an important
> > downstream's epoch?
>
> An alternative might be for Launchpad to allow whitelisted downgrades
> of source p
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> So is it appropriate to bump an epoch in Debian to match an important
> downstream's epoch?
Yes. Precisely because there is collaboration between both sides on those
packages.
The attitude "we don't care of mistakes made by derivatives" is
counter-produc
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 02:28:35AM +, Harish Venkatraman wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I am trying to manually back port to Linux 4.9 since in the link I don’t see
> a patch provided for 4.9 version. The last version that has this patch is
> 4.11, wanted to know if back port of this patch is support
Hi Ben,
I am trying to manually back port to Linux 4.9 since in the link I don’t see a
patch provided for 4.9 version. The last version that has this patch is 4.11,
wanted to know if back port of this patch is supported on Linux 4.9 or this
patch is supported only from 4.11?
Sent from my iPho
12 matches
Mail list logo
