Bug#904309: RFP: tilda -- [SHORT DESCRIPTION]

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org --- Please fill out the fields below. --- Package name: tilda Version: 1.4.1-2 Upstream Author: Sebastian Geiger URL: http://github.com/lanoxx/tilda [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

19 juillet 2018 17:15 "Jonathan Dowland" a écrit: > Thanks Marc for raising this on -devel. I am the person who originally > brought attention to the package on -private. I did so there, because > I did not feel confident in doing so in a public space initially. It > wasn't my intention to irrita

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

Ben Hutchings - 23.07.18, 02:34: > On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 23:34 +0200, Romain Bignon wrote: > > On 22/Jul - 13:14, Geoffrey Thomas wrote: > > > And, as far as I know, everyone who's replied on this thread > > > (myself > > > included) is a man - so I think we should be particularly careful > > > wit

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

On 2018-07-22 13:14 -0400, Geoffrey Thomas wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2018, Wookey wrote: > > > I think they're funny, which I think is what was intended by > > upstream. I enjoy a gratuitous boob-or-handjob mention as much as the > > next 14 year old. > > As much as the next 14-year-old _boy_. Goo

Re: MemberBenefits - Steam Keys (Was: Bits from the DPL (May 2018))

No, I have not received a reply. Cheers, On 2018-07-21 07:40 PM, Samuel Henrique wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I sent an email on 1st June (when this thread started) > to debian-steam[a]collabora.com requesting it > but got no response. > Is it still going? > > Did you rece

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 23:34 +0200, Romain Bignon wrote: > On 22/Jul - 13:14, Geoffrey Thomas wrote: > > And, as far as I know, everyone who's replied on this thread (myself > > included) is a man - so I think we should be particularly careful with "it > > doesn't bother me." > > You're right, that

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 11:28:32PM +0200, Romain Bignon wrote: > On 22/Jul - 10:15, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: > > > but... https://git.weboob.org/weboob/devel/merge_requests/232 > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. It's not in yet and I've just asked upstream > > to clean this mess. > > This i

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

On 22/Jul - 10:15, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: > > but... https://git.weboob.org/weboob/devel/merge_requests/232 > > Thanks for pointing this out. It's not in yet and I've just asked upstream > to clean this mess. This is a merge request, not accepted. In the meantime, a commit has been merged w

Bug#904294: ITP: golang-github-gdamore-encoding -- Various character map encodings missing from golang.org/x/net/encoding

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paride Legovini * Package name: golang-github-gdamore-encoding Version : 0.0~git20151215.b23993c-1 Upstream Author : Garrett D'Amore * URL : https://github.com/gdamore/encoding * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: G

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

On 7/22/18 2:50 AM, Wookey wrote: > On 2018-07-21 12:54 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:34:19PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >>> I refuse to judge the matter with my feelings. >> Rationality has a place, but so do feelings. >> >> The names in this package are offensive

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

On Sun, 22 Jul 2018, Wookey wrote: I think they're funny, which I think is what was intended by upstream. I enjoy a gratuitous boob-or-handjob mention as much as the next 14 year old. As much as the next 14-year-old _boy_. Even if Debian takes the position that the package name (and executabl

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

Hi Marc, On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 09:39:51AM +0900, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: > - is it degrading? > « These are acts that, even if done by consent, convey a message that > diminishes the importance or value of all human beings. » > This does no apply here as there is no depiction of act or e

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

Quack, On 2018-07-22 19:16, Rens Houben wrote: In other news for Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 09:39:51AM +0900, Marc Dequènes { A whole lot of refuge in technicalities snipped } There was no "technicalities". I decided to explain my decision and not base it on vague feelings or emotional outburst

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 12:16:22PM +0200, Rens Houben wrote: > No one in this entire thread was asking that this software be removed. > > Instead, all along the suggestion has been "Rename some of the programs > because Debian is not run by a bunch of puerile twelve-year-olds who get > their sense

Bug#904253: ITP: golang-github-lucasb-eyer-go-colorful -- A library for playing with colors in go (golang).

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paride Legovini * Package name: golang-github-lucasb-eyer-go-colorful Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Lucas Beyer * URL : https://github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful * License : MIT Programming Lang: Go Description

Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?

In other news for Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 09:39:51AM +0900, Marc Dequènes (duck) has been seen typing: > Quack, > It seems the project is leaving the decision about Weboob onto me, so I'll > try to address it. { A whole lot of refuge in technicalities snipped } > So apart from objectification

Bug#904250: ITP: golang-github-ulule-limiter -- Dead simple rate limit middleware for Go.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paride Legovini * Package name: golang-github-ulule-limiter Version : 2.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Ulule * URL : https://github.com/ulule/limiter * License : MIT Programming Lang: Go Description : Dead simple rate li

Bug#904249: ITP: gmbal-commons -- GlassFish MBean Annotation Library (Common APIs)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Emmanuel Bourg User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org Usertags: default-java11 * Package name: gmbal-commons Version : 3.2.1-b003 Upstream Author : Oracle Corporation * URL : https://javaee.github.io/gmbal-commons * License :

Re: Bug#903977: ITP: sbws -- Simple Bandwidth Scanner

Hello! Philipp Kern: > On 18.07.2018 20:38, ju xor wrote: >> Philipp Kern: >>> On 2018-07-18 18:24, ju xor wrote: Philipp Kern: > Should this live in some kind of tor-* namespace? no >>> Without any rationale? :( >> i'm not sure what you mean, but in case it helps, here some argumen