Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Lemmen
* Package name: perl6-zef
Version : 0.4.4
Upstream Author : Nick Logan, "tony-o" and others
* URL : https://github.com/ugexe/zef
* License : Artistive Version 2
Programming Lang: Perl 6
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Lemmen
* Package name: perl6-tap-harness
Version : 20180415
Upstream Author : Leon Timmermans and others
* URL : https://github.com/perl6/tap-harness6
* License : Artistic Version 2
Programming Lang: Perl 6
Des
Quoting Lumin (2018-07-13 18:13:26)
> > Seems you elaborated only that it is ridiculously slow so use CPUs
> > instead of [non-free blob'ed] GPUs - not that it is *impossible to
> > use CPUs.
> >
> > If I am mistaken and you addressed the _possibility_ (not
> > popularity) of reproducing/modify
Hi Jonas,
> Seems you elaborated only that it is ridiculously slow so use CPUs
> instead of [non-free blob'ed] GPUs - not that it is *impossible to use
> CPUs.
>
> If I am mistaken and you addressed the _possibility_ (not popularity) of
> reproducing/modifying/researching with CPUs, then I apolog
Hi Russell,
> On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 18:15 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Compare neural networks: a user who uses a pre-trained neural network
> > is subordinated to the people who prepared its training data and set
> > up the training runs.
>
> In Alpha-Zero's case (it is Alpha-Zero the original
Quoting Lumin (2018-07-13 16:34:44)
> > Perhaps I am missing something, but if _possible_ just 100x slower
> > to use CPUs instead of GPUs, then I fail to recognize how it cannot
> > be reproduced, modified, and researched 100x slower.
[...]
>CPU takes ridiculously long time, compared to GP
Hi Ian,
> Lumin writes ("Concerns to software freedom when packaging deep-learning
> based appications."):
> > 1. Is GPL-licended pretrained neural network REALLY FREE? Is it really
> > DFSG-compatible?
>
> No. No.
>
> Things in Debian main shoudl be buildable *from source* using Debian
>
Hi Jonas
> Perhaps I am missing something, but if _possible_ just 100x slower to
> use CPUs instead of GPUs, then I fail to recognize how it cannot be
> reproduced, modified, and researched 100x slower.
>
> Quite interesting question you raise!
I can provide at least two data points:
1. The a
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Dominik George wrote:
> > I don't think categorizing these things as spam is the right thing to do
> > -- although ignoring them most of the time is.
>
> If they don't care enough about privacy and free software before doing a
> survey in a privacy and free software community
Hi,
> I don't think categorizing these things as spam is the right thing to do
> -- although ignoring them most of the time is.
If they don't care enough about privacy and free software before doing a
survey in a privacy and free software community using privacy and free
software ignorant tools,
Hi Chris,
[Cc list trimmed]
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 05:05:48PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Wouter et al.,
>
> > This questionnaire contains an error:
>
> Whilst I certainly appreciate your usual attention to detail and
> preciseness note that these questionnaires — whilst they appear to be
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: handsome_feng
* Package name: kylin-display-switch
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : shine
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org/kylin-team/kylin-display-switch
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-mitools
Version : 2.3
Upstream Author : Thomas Lumley
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=mitools
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: GNU R
Description : GNU R tools for
13 matches
Mail list logo
